Answer:
Everyone was replaceable; it an unskilled worker was fired for asking for fair wages, another worker was ready to take the job immediately
Explanation: Here's why it can't be any of the others:
A: "Workers were not smart enough to stick up for themselves or ask for better working conditions" There were people who asked for better working conditions but were fired.
B: "Unskilled workers did not deserve protection at work until they learned the skills of the workplace." They never got protection at all yet.
C: "Working conditions were not bad, there were always workers willing to take the job." The working conditions were awfully dangerous.
what is the pattern. yes i checked multiple times there is no pattern
It was caused by collectivization. The food was gathered and taken away from all lands of Ukrainian people by the Soviet Union and people starved. But political debates also contributed to this famine.
Explanation:
The Great Famine of 1932-1933 wasn't solely the end result<span> of </span>constitution however conjointly a crucial plan of action<span> in </span>status policy<span>, </span>an effort<span> by the Soviet Regime </span>to unravel<span> its Ukrainian </span>drawback<span> once and for all. Firstly the liquidation of the kulaks - </span>the higher<span> off peasants - was a politically </span>impelled<span> act of lunacy. The kulaks </span>weren't happier as a result of<span> they were exploiting the </span>employees<span> - </span>because the<span> Bolsheviks argued - </span>however<span>, in truth, they were </span>happier as a result of<span> they were </span>higher<span> farmers. By removing them from the land, and imposing </span>town<span> born, politically trained managers on the farms, Ukrainian agricultural output fell. </span>
<span>Secondly the peasants themselves, </span>inadvertently<span>, helped </span>to form<span> the famine worse. </span>so as to forestall<span> the collective from taking their </span>eutherian<span> and grain surpluses, they destroyed them. This meant that there was no food store </span>to examine<span> them through any worse times.</span>
Why did Lincoln speak of a house divided?
He saw the ideas of free and slave territory causing disharmony.
~Hope this answers your question!~
~Can ya mark me brainliest?~
European nobility originated in the feudal/seignorial system that arose in Europe during the Middle Ages. Originally, knights<span> or nobles were mounted warriors who swore allegiance to their sovereign and promised to fight for him in exchange for an allocation of land (usually together with serfs living thereon).
</span>What obligations did lords and vassals have under the feudal system<span>? A </span>lord<span>granted his </span>vassal<span> a fief. The </span>lord<span> promised to protect his </span>vassal. In return, thevassal<span> pledged loyalty to his </span>lord<span>, as well as military service, money, payments and advice</span><span>
</span>
