What kind of logical fallacy is this and how do you know:

1 answer:

6 0

From PurdueOwl.com: “Circular Argument: This restates the argument rather than actually proving it. Example:
George Bush is a good communicator because he speaks effectively.
In this example, the conclusion that Bush is a "good communicator" and the evidence used to prove it "he speaks effectively" are basically the same idea. Specific evidence such as using everyday language, breaking down complex problems, or illustrating his points with humorous stories would be needed to prove either half of the sentence.”

You might be interested in

What is the definition of “prose”? A. a type of iambic pentameter B. ordinary speech pattern C. a type of poetic meter D. rhymin

Juli2301 [7.4K]

Prose is B, ordinary speech pattern.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Audience has a huge impact on the and of the writing

Rus_ich [418]

Answer:

The audience makes it better. The writer is happy people love their books.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

There are many kinds of informative writing. When a writer explores the varied meanings of a word or phrase, he or she is likely

Llana [10]

Answer:

Analytical Essay

Explanation:

An analytical essay requires the presentation of an argument or claim by breaking down and examining the core components of an issue, idea, or works of art such as films, books, paintings.

7 0

2 years ago

Select the best description for the statement: The snake we discovered hiding in the woodshed was nearly seven feet long.

Archy [21]

It would be B Neutral tone, Literal. Ok to the reason it would be neutral is because it isn’t like positive or negative, it is just simply stating that the snake discovered in the woodshed was nearly seven feet long. And it would be literal because there isn’t like a hidden meaning in the sentence that you have to think about or like any figurative like such as similes or metaphors. It is telling us there is that there was literally a snake discovered hiding in the woodshed that was nearly 7 feet long

7 0

3 years ago

Which kind of argument uses specific premises to reach an unavoidable and certain conclusion?

Scrat [10]

Deductive reasoning is the kind of argument uses specific premises to reach an unavoidable and certain conclusion.

<h3>What is deductive reasoning?</h3>

Deductive reasoning is a logic process in which the conclusion of the content is based on many or multiple premises that may or may not be true. Essentially, it is a type of reasoning in which the conclusion serves as the premise.

As an illustration, A = B. B and C are also equal. Deductive reasoning allows you to draw the conclusion that A and C are equal given those two statements.

Thus, it is Deductive reasoning.

For more details about Deductive reasoning, click here:

brainly.com/question/16685989

#SPJ4

4 0

1 year ago