The main argument against the border states leaving the Union during this time was of course that it was treason and punishable by death. Arguments for staying in the Union also included the fact that there were far more men and resources in the north.
The explorations that led to the discovery of <u>Tintaya mine</u> go<em><u> back to 1917</u></em>. <em><u>In 1971</u></em>, the Peruvian government promoted the exploitation of the mine. <em><u>In 1980</u></em>, the expropriation of approximately 4,000 hectares of land, owned by the communities, was carried out. It is for this reason that started a dispute between the commoners and the Company. <em><u>In 1985 </u></em>the exploitation of <u>Tintaya</u> began and it became the third producer of the country. <em><u>In 1994</u></em>, the mine was bought by Broken Hill Proprietary (BHP), who subsequently merged with the company Billiton, forming the second biggest group in the world production of minerals. <em><u>In 2001</u></em>, the first proposal for the framework agreement was made public. An agreement was reached and the framework agreement was consolidated <em><u>in 2003</u></em>. The signature of the framework agreement was an innovative milestone. Never before, a mining company had agreed to transfer a percentage of profits to communities and to engage to dialogue with them at all times. <em><u>In 2005</u></em>, a violent takeover occurred of the <u>Tintaya</u> facilities. A reformulation of the framework agreement was demanded. The implementation of the framework agreement was taking place very slowly. The president of BHP Billiton had to suspend the mining activity until a new agreement was reached. Then the negotiations began again. Xstrata Cooper (now Glencore) bought <u>Tintaya</u> from BHP Billiton <em><u>in 2006</u></em>. The owner changed, but the same conflicts and mobilizations continued until <em><u>2012</u></em>. The last stoppage lasted eight days. During this paralysis, violent acts occurred and even the mine was asked to close, which was completely rejected by the government. Finally, at present, no resolution or reformulation of the framework agreement has been reached.
The passage supports the claim of the passage by indicating that the addition of sugar was a significant change to Europeans' diets. Thus the last option is correct.
<h3>Who were Europeans?</h3>
Europeans were the the people who live in the continent of Europe.The Europe comprises of the countries like Russia, Germany, England, France, Italy, Poland, Spain,Ukraine, Romania etc.
The complete question is attached below.
The above passage indicates that sugar played important role in the diet of the Europeans as it says that Sugar was given its on place as in the dessert. It became the food of necessity.
Sugar didn't only had the impact on the wealthy Europeans diet but also on the England's poorest workers also included it in their diet. Thus the last option is correct.
Learn more about Europeans here:
brainly.com/question/3387326
#SPJ1
The answer is the Immigrants and the Agricultural Revolution.
Answer:
The Doolittle Raid
Explanation:
The Doolittle Raid was a good Yokohama, a response from America after the attack on Pearl Harbor by Japan. The Doolittle's crews retaliated for Pearl Harbor by beating the Japanese mainland- at home. The attack was conducted under Lieutenant Colonel James H. Doolittle flying the B-25s. The mission was to drop their bombs on military targets in Tokyo, Kobe, Yokohama, and Osaka.
