<u>The reason that Pablo Picasso, become wealthy during his lifetime and the artist, Vincent van Gogh, remain poor his entire life:</u>
Pablo Picasso and Vincent van Gogh had more features in common. They had unanimously indistinct style of arts which had become immediately identifiable.
In spite of all that, Picasso died as a rich man owning an estate which is estimated at nearly 750 million dollar whereas Van Gogh died as a pauper.
Studies claim that the reason behind this would be that, Van Gogh remained to be a loner and socially inactive. He was depending on his brother to meet the social world and in contrast Picasso was a charismatic active member in various social clubs where her had multiple number of contacts and connections.
It's been said that Pablo Picasso was a hub who had a vast network of social lines and Vincent Van Gogh was a silent or solitary node.
But now, the paintings of both the greatest artists were well spoken and sell for more than 100,000,000 US Dollars.
Answer:
a.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec, 31. 2020 Cash $1,000
Customer Deposits $1,000
b.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec, 31. 2020 Customer deposits $800
Cash $800
c.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec, 31. 2020 Customer deposits $120
Breakage Revenue $120
Cost of goods sold(0.8 * 120) $ 96
Inventory $ 96
To get the formula for the principal, we will use the
formula for the interest and derived it from there:
I = Prt is the equation then it will be P = I /rt since we
are looking for the principal.
P = I /rt
= $500 / (0.145 x 240/360)
= $500 / 0.0967
= $5170.63
To check:
I = Prt
= $5170.3 x 0.145 x 240/360
= $499.8 or $500
Answer:
<em>Disparate-impact discrimination</em>
Explanation:
As we can see in the given scenario, that Nell believes that the test has an unintentionally discriminatory effect as he fails in the test taken by the company, so this discriminating act that was made by the Origami Paper Corporation is a <u>disparate-impact discrimination</u>.
<em>Because as we know that if someone is been discriminated unintentionally, then it comes under disparate-impact discrimination.</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
31% mark up based on cost
$100 * 1.31 = $131
Same mark up based on selling price
$131 - $100 = $31
Therefore, our percent mark up if selling price were the base; =$31/$131 * 100 = 23.66%
