1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sladkaya [172]
2 years ago
5

When studying history, it is important to understand bias and its possible impact on a historical narrative. Historians are a pr

oduct of their various opinions and backgrounds, and the student of history must keep this in mind when studying a secondary historical source. One historian, for example, might place emphasis on the social causes of a historical event while another historian might argue for economic causes. These two points of view would have the potential to greatly impact the historical narrative told by these historians.
Which of the following is the main point of the passage used here?
A.
There can only be a few causes of any particular historical event.
B.
Social causes of events are usually overshadowed by economic causes.
C.
Bias should be excluded from historical analysis as much as possible.
D.
A historian's narrative will reflect his or her own opinions.
History
2 answers:
vaieri [72.5K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

By process of elimination, this passage is not arguing about the topics of a specific event, it's broadly warning readers that Historians tend to make bias arguments based on their background or knowledge of an event. The author was only providing an example, but that doesn't mean it's what the whole paragraph is aout. It's also not remotely saying Bias needs to be removed, it's just saying it exists.

Hopefully this helps! :D

trasher [3.6K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I would say D

Explanation:

He is explaining how 2 different opinions could be told

You might be interested in
3. Trust in God.<br> Mark 9:33–37 Luke 11:9-13<br> Matthew 6:25-34<br><br> what does it come from?
wlad13 [49]
It comes from the Bible
8 0
3 years ago
Why did Western Europe develop stronger economies than Eastern Europe?
hoa [83]

The reason why Western Europe developed Stronger Economies than Eastern Europe is because of the Berlin Wall. On the West side, It was fine, and normal. But on the East Side, it has Communism Rule, and they had a weaker economy. When the Wall was taken down in 1991, Their economy slowly came back up, but not as big as the Western Sides Economy.

7 0
2 years ago
Name three technologies or building and craft materials used by the Harappans of the Indus Valley
Lady_Fox [76]
Bronze, copper, fired bricks
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you could be one mythical creature what would you be
erastovalidia [21]
Honestly I would be a fairy
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describes the purpose and organization of the legislative Branch
sukhopar [10]
They make some of the changes to the government
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the Whiskey Rebellion and the government's actions in response to it.
    6·2 answers
  • What was a direct result of Jamestown's success?
    12·2 answers
  • Which identifies Napoleon’s impact on Europe
    8·2 answers
  • What did ancient egypt and mesopotamia have in comman with writing?
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone help me
    13·2 answers
  • What idea did George Washington introduce as president of the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • Why do some people prefer ratifying conventions, rather than state legislatures, for the ratification of amendments?
    8·1 answer
  • Do Black Lives Matter To you <br> PLEASE TELL THE TRUTH OR NO BRAINLIEST!?!?!
    7·2 answers
  • What are the reasons why the United States provided military support to Prime<br> Minister Diem?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the theory that a nation can become strong by building up its gold supply and expanding its trade?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!