He has qualifications.
He is 35+ of age
he is a citizen
and has had 14 years of residency in the Unites States
Answer:
The last one is the answer
Explanation:
Carly's opinion is that she should get a puppy for her birthday, and she uses her research as evidence
Explanation:
Trade was also a boon for human interaction, bringing cross-cultural contact to a whole new level. When people first settled down into larger towns in Mesopotamia and Egypt, self-sufficiency – the idea that you had to produce absolutely everything that you wanted or needed – started to fade. A farmer could now trade grain for meat, or milk for a pot, at the local market, which was seldom too far away. Cities started to work the same way, realizing that they could acquire goods they didn't have at hand from other cities far away, where the climate and natural resources produced different things. This longer-distance trade was slow and often dangerous but was lucrative for the middlemen willing to make the journey. The first long-distance trade occurred between Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley in Pakistan around 3000 BC, historians believe. Long-distance trade in these early times was limited almost exclusively to luxury goods like spices, textiles, and precious metals. Cities that were rich in these commodities became financially rich, too, satiating the appetites of other surrounding regions for jewelry, fancy robes, and imported delicacies. It wasn't long after that trade networks crisscrossed the entire Eurasian continent, inextricably linking cultures for the first time in history. By the second millennium BC, former backwater island Cyprus had become a major Mediterranean player by ferrying its vast copper resources to the Near East and Egypt, regions wealthy due to their own natural resources such as papyrus and wool. Phoenicia, famous for its seafaring expertise, hawked its valuable cedarwood and linens dyes all over the Mediterranean. China prospered by trading jade, spices, and later, silk. Britain shared its abundance of tin.
My hands hurt now :')
Anyways Hope this helped, Have a nice day!
Answer:
True
Explanation:
For the purpose of understanding and solving issues on foreign policy on international disputes, research respondents have recognized specific components that would facilitate them to nominate an expert as an arbitrator in international arbitration.
Even though experts (both technical and legal) is obvious choice quality for an arbitral judiciary in international arbitration, there are cases of using non-expert but diplomats taking importance participants' view
Hence, it is TRUE that a democratic society runs the risk of over-reacting or under-reacting in the foreign policy arena because experts are not the sole arbitrators of what course of action to pursue
