1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
borishaifa [10]
3 years ago
6

The supreme court defends a person’s right to use obscene and profane speech. true or false?

History
2 answers:
erastova [34]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The answer is (True)

Explanation:

qaws [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Design five survey questions in an effort to determine what people would think if the Moral Majority emerged again. Be sure to d
insens350 [35]
I'll offer you a basic definition of the Moral Majority and a sample survey question you might consider.  You can take it from there.

The Moral Majority was a political action group founded in 1979 by Rev. Jerry Falwell, aimed at promoting the values of the Christian right in American public policy.  The Moral Majority focused on issues like promoting prayer in schools, outlawing abortion, and preserving traditional views on family roles.  (The group opposed the Equal Rights Amendment for that reason.)

Here's a sample of a sort of survey question you might use:

Which statement most closely represents your view concerning homosexuality?
A) It is an alternate lifestyle chosen by some, which should not be persecuted by society.
B) It is an attraction or desire that some people have as a biological fact.
C) It is a sin forbidden by the Bible and should be illegal.
D) It is one of many acceptable forms of sexual self-expression.

A Moral Majority sort of response would be choice C. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which group in Hawaii was in favor of annexation by the United States?
REY [17]

Answer:

A. Ordinary Hawaiians

<h2>Who encouraged the annexation of Hawaii and why?</h2>

There is a complicated history behind the United States of America's eventual conquest of Hawaii. One that a little letter simply cannot do credit to. I will only briefly touch on some of the most significant incidents and overarching ideas.

One may start in 1851, when the French were mistreating the Hawaiian government once more and there was genuine danger that they would spiral out of control. Hawaii attempted to give sovereignty to the British as a result, but they showed little interest. They then came close to the USA. They signed a document transferring sovereignty to the United States in the event of war. But there was never a necessity (and it is unlikely that America was any more interested in being responsible for that faraway place than The United Kingdom was).

However, compared to other foreign states, Hawaii garnered more commercial and social attention from America. The problem of annexation became more pressing as trade links deepened over time. In the late 1860s and early 1870s the desire for a treaty of reciprocity for trade became so great that it was considered a matter of reciprocity or annexation.

Kalkaua was chosen as king by the Hawaiian legislature in 1874. This was mostly brought on by the mischief (er, influence) of regional American interests. They worried that Queen Emma, a popular figure and the widow of a past monarch, was too pro-British. He oversaw the signing of the reciprocity pact. It also gave America some access to the perhaps significant Pearl Harbor.

However, King Kalkaua had his own ideas about how to rule and resented the limitations that others tried to impose on him. He distinctly lost the support of the majority of Hawaii's "foreign" population. Since they were of foreign descent—in many cases, they were Hawaii citizens—we have put the word in quotation marks. The Kalkaua government was not just a nuisance, but also mocked for its various scandals. Many of them were due to the king’s attempting to acquire funds to promote his interests, private and public.

In 1887, everything came to a head. American citizens and those of American ancestry in particular staged a blatant uprising, forcing the monarch to sign a new constitution that, incidentally, severely curtailed the right to vote (those who qualified to vote). There were other famous organizers, including Lorrin A. Thurston.

Around this period, the American government started to take a more expansionist stance. James G. Blaine was appointed Secretary of State by the Harrison administration in 1889. He and John L. Stevens, his choice to serve as Hawaii's diplomatic ambassador, had a strong ambition to annex the islands to the United States. In addition, things started to move in Hawaii. The Annexation Club, a covert group, was created. Ostensibly not to precipitate annexation, but only to be ready if the need arose… In 1893, it did really arise.

Queen Liliuokalani, the monarch of Hawaii, aimed to impose a new constitution (essentially undoing the restrictions imposed in 1887). The anti-monarchical forces mobilized as a result, and the queen was overthrown. Even if he wasn't actively involved in the overthrow in this case, Minister Stevens was undoubtedly "dirty." He was in close communication with the leading revolutionaries, quickly recognized the new administration, and ordered American forces to land (as a "precaution"). The troops did little more than remain in their camp on the coast, but it was evident that their presence intimidated the overthrown administration.

Of course, the Provisional Government was eager for quick annexation by the United States (as suggested by its name). Sadly, Grover Cleveland had recently beaten Benjamin Harrison, and the new American administration was not interested in supporting them. In fact, they gave the monarchy some serious thought! But annexation had to wait till Hawaii was taken in with the spoils of the Spanish-American War because it was not to be.

Thank you,

Eddie

8 0
2 years ago
most economists believe that free trade is good for the economy of large nations true or false please help
prohojiy [21]
True is correct. ......
3 0
3 years ago
Why did the United States blame Great Britain when the Shawnee tribe attacked General Harrison and his troop?
Sergeu [11.5K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you did not attach options for this question, we can say the following.

The United States blamed Great Britain when the Shawnee tribe attacked General Harrison and his troop because the federal US government thought that the English supported Tecumseh, who was the leader of the Shawnee, decide not to sign the Treaty of Fort Wayne of 1809.

This caused much conflict between the Shawnee and the white Americans. On November 7, 1811, in the so-called Battle of Tippecanoe, the troops sent by Governor William Henry Harrison(he was the governor of the Indian Territory) were attacked by surprise by the Native Indians. However, the troops -about 1000 soldiers- bravely resisted and defeated the Shawnee in the battleground of Prophetstown, next to the Tippecanoe River.

3 0
3 years ago
What was "king" and the main topic of conversation in the south?
zvonat [6]
C.) cotton Thats the answer, the king main topic of the conversation in the south                                                                                                                
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • At the Constitutional Convention, delegates from northern and southern states disagreed about:
    7·2 answers
  • The interior of Australia, which is sparsely inhabited with low plateaus and plains is called
    13·1 answer
  • Describe how George Curry first won Roosevelt's admiration.<br> Help ASAP
    13·1 answer
  • all the rivers run to the sea elie wiesel which genre does this passage belong to an.autobiography b. memoir a. biography
    5·1 answer
  • Why are rivers vital to europes economy
    14·1 answer
  • Why do you think the legal age to marry is 21 and not 18 in the 1500s?
    9·1 answer
  • "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall
    12·2 answers
  • What is the relationship between historical questions and historical
    15·1 answer
  • What goal did the American revolution and the French Revolution have in common?
    7·1 answer
  • Pls help i rlly need it
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!