The answer is Personification
Answer:
No, morals can be based on your own decisions based on what's right and wrong. morals are not restricted by anything.
Explanation:
ethics should be sperated from religion as it gets in the way of progress in the world, not to confuse morals with religion.
morals are what's right and wrong.
religion is a way of life and dedicates your life to what your religion says is right and wrong.
In this excerpt, we can read the conclusion of Victor Frankenstein about science: in the 19th century, scientists pursue their studies at any personal or moral cost:
"With a confusion of ideas only to be accounted for by my extreme youth and my want of a guide on such matters, I had retrod the steps of nowledge along the paths of time and exchanged the discoveries of recent inquirers for the dreams of forgotten alchemists. Besides, I had a contempt for the uses of modern natural philosophy. It was very different when the masters of the science sought immortality and power; such views, although futile, were grand; but now the scene was changed. The ambition of the inquirer seemed to limit itself to the annihilation of those visions on which my interest in science was chiefly founded. I was required to exchange chimeras of boundless grandeur for realities of little worth.
Such were my reflections during the first two or three days of my residence at Ingolstadt, which were chiefly spent in becoming acquainted with the localities and the principal residents (..)"
When the objective of the science experiments is only the recognition, the need for making something original and spectacular, to be regarded by other scientists the results could be terrible. For example, the creation of the poor monster of Frankenstein story.
For question excerpt number 1, <span>Garcia uses American baseball terminology to suggest fate’s defeat explains how Garcia’s word choice identifies her voice in the excerpt.
Same as excerpt number 2 in which the statement "</span>Soto relates a story from his life to make a point about what it means to live in a multicultural society" explains how Soto's established his voice in the passage.
Both statement explains how the structures of the excerpts are similar because "Each presents factual evidence to appeal to the reader’s logic".
