Answer:Skill‐based pay programs
Explanation:
S.B.P abbreviated as Skill‐based pay are known as the programs or compensation system that tends to provide employees with rewards i.e. additional pay or incentives in return for certification of worker's mastery of the knowledge, skills, and the competencies. The skills are thereby attained and thus apparent expertise in performing assignment.
Explanation:
The player can recover the $5,000 because the preexisting duty rule does not apply where the duty is owed to a third person.
The player can recover because, under the prevailing modern rule, the preexisting duty rule does not apply if the duty is owed to a third person. Generally, contracts must be supported by consideration. A promise to perform is valid consideration, but if a person already owes a duty to perform, traditionally that performance cannot be used as consideration for another promise. Thus, under the traditional rule, the player could not enforce the father's promise to pay the player $5,000 if he hit a home run because the player gave no valid consideration in exchange for the father's promise, since the player owed a preexisting duty to his ball club to exert his best efforts to hit home runs. However, under the modern view as formulated in Restatement (Second) of Contracts, section 73, and followed by a majority of courts, a duty is a preexisting duty only if it is owed to the promisee. Thus, a promise to perform a duty is valid consideration as long as the duty of performance is not already owed to the promisee. In other words, if the duty is owed to a third party, a promise to perform given to another is valid consideration as long as it was bargained for. (B) is incorrect because there is no exception to the preexisting duty rule—modern or otherwise—that allows the promisor to recover merely because his performance benefited a third party. The player can recover under the modern approach because his promise to the father was bargained for. Conversely, the player does not have to prove that the value of his home run to the boy was at least $5,000, because courts generally will not inquire into the adequacy of consideration. (C) would be correct under the traditional rule, but, under the modern trend, the promise here is valid consideration because the duty to hit home runs was owed to a third party (the ball club) rather than to the promisee (the father). (D) is incorrect because while it is true that moral consideration is not good consideration, the father did not rely on moral consideration, but rather exchanged a promise to pay $5,000 for the player's performance.
The correct answer is True
Explanation:
In the economy and related fields, a commodity refers to a valuable good that can be sold, traded, etc. This can be tangible or intangible. In the case of time, nowadays in the U.S. and other cultures, this is considered as one of the most valuable intangible commodities. This is because time is part of the economy, for example, when you accept to work, the salary you receive is not only equivalent to your abilities and work but also to the time you spend working. Additionally, it is considered time can be bought in some cases, for example, if you pay someone to clean, cook, etc. you will have more free time for you. This means, despite being intangible, time can be traded, sold or purchased. Thus, it is true in the American culture time is a commodity.
Answer: Phantom limb pain
(PLP)
Explanation:
Phantom limb pain
(PLP) is defined as the continuous pain that occurs from the limb section in which limb is no longer present or it has been removed .Sensation of pain occurs in that missing area after the surgical treatment.This pain tends to becomes weaker according to time.
According to the question, removing the leg of Chris after accident causes pain and burning sensations to him. This describes about phantom limb pain.
The freedom of speech, the freedom of religion, the freedom of press, the right to bear arms, the right of housing for soldiers, Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, Protection of Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property, Rights of Accused Persons in Criminal Cases, rights in civil cases, Excessive Bail, Fines, and Punishments Forbidden.
