Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the table attached,
x-intercept of the linear function is, the value of 'x' when f(x) = 0
x = 3 [x-intercept]
Function 'g' is the sum of 2 and the cube root of the sum of three time x and 1.
g(x) = ![2+\sqrt[3]{3x+1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2%2B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B3x%2B1%7D)
For x-intercept,
g(x) = 0
![2+\sqrt[3]{3x+1}=0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2%2B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B3x%2B1%7D%3D0)
3x + 1 = (-2)³
3x + 1 = -8
3x = -8 - 1
3x = -9
x = -3
Therefore, the x-intercept of function 'f' is different or greater than the x-intercept of function g.
The answer is B
Because if you use your calculation right you would end up with 16,463
Answer:
The ratio of the intensities is roughly 6:1.
Step-by-step explanation:
The intensity I() of an earthquake wave is given by:
<em>where P: is the power ans d: is the distance. </em>
Hence, the ratio of the intensities of an earthquake wave passing through the Earth and detected at two points 19 km and 46 km from the source is:

<em>where I₁ = P/4πd₁², d₁=19 km, I₁ = P/4πd₂² and d₂=46 km </em>

Therefore, the ratio of the intensities is roughly 6:1.
I hope it helps you!
The third and last options are the answers.
The graph is shifted to the right by some number. The coordinates aren't numbered, so it could be literally anything. To shift to the right, the equation will be |x-y| where y is any number.
No because Pi is an irrational number so adding 2 to Pi will also be irrational.