Answer:
(of a woman or her behaviour) reserved, modest, and shy.
Explanation:
Elie Wiesel's literary work prompted one reviewer to recall Isaac Bashevis Singer's definition of Jews as "a people who can't sleep themselves and let nobody else sleep," and to predict, "While Elie Wiesel lives and writes, there will be no rest for the wicked, the uncaring or anyone else." [1<span>] If uneasiness is the result of Wiesel's work, it is not a totally unintended result. Since the publication of </span>Night<span> in 1958, Wiesel, a Jewish survivor of the Nazi death camps, has borne a persistent, excruciating literary witness to the Holocaust. His works of fiction and non-fiction, his speeches and stories have each had the same intent: to hold the conscience of Jew and non-Jew (and, he would say, even the conscience of God) in a relentless focus on the horror of the Holocaust and to make this, the worst of all evils, impossible to forget.</span>
Wiesel refuses to allow himself or his readers to forget the Holocaust because, as a survivor, he has assumed the role of messenger. It is his duty to witness as a "messenger of the dead among the living," [2] and to prevent the evil of the victims' destruction from being increased by being forgotten. But he does not continue to retell the tales of the dead only to make life miserable for the living, or even to insure that such an atrocity will not happen again. Rather, Elie Wiesel is motivated by a need to wrestle theologically with the Holocaust.
The grim reality of the annihilation of six million Jews presents a seemingly insurmountable obstacle to further theological thought: how is it possible to believe in God after what happened? The sum of Wiesel's work is a passionate effort to break through this barrier to new understanding and faith. It is to his credit that he is unwilling to retreat into easy atheism, just as he refuses to bury his head in the sand of optimistic faith. What Wiesel calls for is a fierce, defiant struggle with the Holocaust, and his work tackles a harder question: how is it possible not to believe in God after what happened? [3]
If I remember correctly, it was because Mowgli was a human and not an animal. Plus they thought he was going to hurt them like how hunters do.
Answer:
Find explanation below.
Explanation:
In the book 'Othello', by William Shakespeare we come across several interesting characters. The first was Othello, a general, Lago, a soldier, Cassio, a loyal captain to Othello, Desdemona, Othello's wife.
In the play, Lago was a deceitful and cunning soldier who tried to usurp the position of Othello as general. To achieve his aim he tried to take advantage of Cassio's good nature. Cassio was courteous with women. On observing his good relationship with Desdemona, Othello's wife, he subtly accused him of having an affair with her. He once talked about Desdemona 'paddling Cassio's hand'. He also tried to make others see things in the same way.
Cassio is not to blame because he did not have any ulterior motive. Lago simply took advantage of his goodness and tried implicating him in his evil plot.
Answer:
A. If Ariel were portrayed as a best, the feel of the production would be much more menacing.
Explanation:
Character depiction refers to the way in which a stage director decides to present a particular character in a play. In this case, Ariel is usually presented as a kind figure. While he is intelligent, he is also obedient and submissive, and not menacing in any way. However, if a production were to present him as a beast, then the play would adopt a much more menacing tone.
