Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
Answer:
In an advertisement by Nurofen (British biggest painkiller company), a false claim was made that the painkiller can specifically diminish the pain for joints and backbone. However, the medicine had no specific mode of action to target these body parts specifically rather it was just a normal pain killer. For this reason, the court banned the company for a false and misleading statement. The link to the advertisement is:
https://www.easymedshealth.com/products/nurofen-joint-back-pain-relief-max-strength-10-gel-40g
The link of banning by court is:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/28/nurofen-advert-banned-for-misleading-claims-on-joint-and-back-pa/
Answer:
C. Since menopause, Sara's levels of the hormone estrogen have dropped.
Explanation:
I majored in Health
More than one-third (35.7 percent) of adults are considered to be obese. More than 1 in 20 (6.3 percent) have extreme obesity. Almost 3 in 4 men (74 percent) are considered to be overweight or obese. The prevalence of obesity is similar for both men and women (about 36 percent
Brainliest please
Answer:
having family members involved in gang activity
Explanation:
if you grow up seeing something you're more likely to do it too
