Answer:
$450 per ton.
Explanation:
The government has allowed to pollute 1600 ton of emission. The business has secured license from the government to run its business activities and drain the polluted waste in the sea. The total pollution allowed is 1600 tons and the cost of securing the license is $720,000. The cost per ton of emission would be $450.
Answer:
1) d. $175,000
2) b. $156,250
Explanation:
1. The computation of net income for 20X9 under the treasury stock method is shown below:-
Net income for 20X9 under the treasury stock method = Janet Operating income + Slider operating income
= $100,000 + $75,000
= $175,000
2. The computation of income assigned to the controlling interest for 20X9 is shown below:-
income assigned to the controlling interest for 20X9 = Janet Operating income + (Slider operating income × Remaining percentage)
= $100,000 + ($75,000 × 75%)
= $100,000 + $56,250
= $156,250
Therefore we have applied the above formulas.
Answer:
d. $ 263.50
Explanation:
The Exchange rate is 1 dollar = 19.924 Uruguayan Peso.
We need to buy 5000 Uruguayan pesos but the agent requires a comision of a 5% when converting currency, so really we will need to buy:
5,000 Uruguayan pesos + 5,000 Uruguayan pesos* 0.05 = 5,250 Uruguayan pesos.
Now if we apply the given exchange rate we will obtain the amount of US Dollars we need:
x U$S = (5,250 Ur.$)/(19,924 Ur.$/U$S)= 263,50 U$S needed
Answer:
MORE| JOBS RISES THE MORE INCOMES.
PLZ MARK BRAINLIEST HAVE A GOOD NIGHT.
Explanation:
Answer: D. You should authorize the $10,000 expenditure to continue the project if the project will generate a positive net present value. The marginal cost-benefit analysis treats the $2.5 million as a cost that is irrelevant to the current decision making.
Explanation:
The options you presented were not all the options listed. The option I have listed as the answer is the correct option.
Under the Marginal Cost - Benefit analysis, only the Additional costs and inflows are considered. The original cost is considered a Sunk Cost and therefore irrelevant.
When making a decision therefore, the company or person should ask if the new investment will bring about a positive NPV. If it is not anticipated to, then there is no need to invest more into it.
