Answer:
The net savings changed the most, and this is because of the extra money coming in via total income. An extra $290.00 was added to the category.
Explanation:
I’m not sure if I understand this,
But I’ll try to figure this one out
Just give me some time
Answer:
Companies have a corporate social responsibility towards their environment.
Explanation:
Corporate social responsibility implies that companies are expected to engage in industrial practices that would not result in harm to their environment. For example, the amount of carbon being released into the environment must be controlled as excessive release of carbon can be detrimental to health. It is also not right for waste to be discharged into the oceans because the health of the sea animals, the ocean itself and those who swim in it are at risk.
To promote sustainability, companies avoid practices that would eventually harm their environment. Abiding by these practices might take a longer route, but is eventually cost effective and beneficial.
Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
Journal entries to record the transaction are as follows,
Debit Computer account with $3,432
Debit Accumulated depreciation account with $18,720
Credit Truck account with $20,800
Credit Cash Account with $520
Credit profit on sale of asset with $832
This the journal entry that balances the books by targeting appropriate accounts.
Note that accumulated depreciation account has a credit balance as it is an asset reducing account.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
Certainly, they cannot prevail. The contract terms stated clearly that "time is of the essence of this contract." The Bassos and Miceli and Slonim Development Corp did not actually respect this contract term.
The contract was expected to have closed at 10:00 am on May 16, 1988, and not after. By the time that Dierberg left the venue, the contract should have been finalized. Alternatively, if there were unseen delays, Dierberg should have been informed at least 30 minutes before 10:00 am.
Explanation:
The argument by Miceli and Slonim does not hold water. The contract did require closing exactly at 10:00 AM, and not some time on May 16. In my considered opinion, suing Dierberg is a waste of court time and process.
