Women were not allowed to participate in decision making in the colonial times. They might have influenced their husbands, but could not directly participate.
La historia de todas las sociedades humanas habidas hasta hoy ha sido la historia de la lucha de clases. Hombre libre y esclavo, patricio y plebeyo, barón y siervo de la gleba, maestro y oficial del gremio, en una palabra, opresores y oprimidos se enfrentaron en perpetuo antagonismo, librando una lucha incesante, a veces encubierta y a veces franca, lucha que se saldó en cada caso con una transformación revolucionaria de toda la sociedad o bien con el hundimiento conjunto de las clases enfrentadas.
The anti-federalists believed that the Constitution would take away critical powers from the states, and warned that without a Bill of Rights the government might also take away the rights of the people that were just won in the Revolution.
Answer:it will cause problems
I don't really see a need for the Equal Rights Amendment in the US constitution because all American citizens are already protected under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. I suppose I see the reasoning that it would "make sure" that everyone is to be treated equally, but wouldn't it just be redundant to the 14th? Yes, I totally believe everyone should be treated equally, but is gender discrimination as big of an issue as it seems to be?
Explanation: