The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
Answer:
Dear diary,
Today I saw a horrible quarrel between my peers.
It was over something as little as a dollar, the two very young boys made a bet, the bet was to see who could spit further away, the reward for spitting the furthest was one dollar. After the game was over and the winner was declared the little boy, he then presented the prize 4 quarters, the other child who had a lack of education was expecting a $1 bill not four quarters, the angry young boy then assaulted the other child who presented the 4 quarters. A ghastly fight then broke out.
Explanation:
To avoid this conflict in the future children should come to an agreement and should be made to get an education.
“these natural disasters’” should be these natural disasters.
You don’t need to add the ‘ to disasters
“Harlem”, also known as “A Dream Deferred” by Langston Hughes.
