In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
The US would impose a retaliatory tariff against another country if they were to attack US shipping during a time of war where the US was a neutral party or if the said country did something major violating a common right or disrespectful to the US as a whole and we would use the tariff to try to force them to fix the issue.
The answer is “No one is important; they are all nothing.” Granger
is mentioning to the nonexistence of significance most persons have over time
in the outstanding arrangement of things. Each individual's life is just a few
seconds in time and space. He even adds that even pronounced men are sooner or
later forgotten.
True. The Kurdish people are the largest ethnic group in the world. However, they have no country to call their own. The Kurds can be found in Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Armenia. They have sought independence and autonomy in each of these countries.
<span> </span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. He helped negotiate peace <span>agreements between Israeli and PLO leaders. C. He helped bring about a stock-market surge, low unemployment, minimal inflation, and general prosperity. D. He supported a welfare reform billed that increased the number of people receiving welfare."</span>
