Judicial Review is the Court's Examination of the Constitutionality of the actions of Congress and the President (and the court's right to nullify what the other branches of government have done if they find it unconstitutional). This process was first established by the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Case.
Answer:
The two types of loans available are Secured loans and Unsecured loans. They differ from one and other due to a secured loan being one that requires you to offer something of value, such as your car or the home you reside in, which you will lose if you cannot pay off the loan. Whilst an Unsecured loan is when the lender does not require you to put down collateral to take out the loan. The lender trusts that you will pay them back, through a bank, credit union, or online lender. If you don’t pay the money back, the lender must go to court to get their coinage.
Hope this helps! Good luck with the assignment!
Answer:
Diah would most likely see the changes adopted by her manager as a way to way to further treat the employees bad. In her company, Diah might have believed that, Casey is treating the staff (including her ) bad hence the lack of trust.
She would try to oppose the changes that was to be introduced inorder to get back to her manager,Casey.
Explanation:
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
