The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
During the majority of WWI, the United States wanted to remain isolated in what many considered to be a European conflict. President Woodrow Wilson himself advocated isolationism until a series of conflicts drew the US into war against Germany.
The constitution and the declaration of the independence had a very delicate balance to strike as they were supposed to protect the individual rights of the citizen and also create a strong federal government.
Explanation:
Declaration of independence states that an individual is born with some natural and inalienable rights and those rights cannot be seized or surrendered. Declaration states that government must safeguard the rights of the people, if failed then the people have the power to dissolve and replace the government.
Articles of confederation proved to be weak and the anti federalists argued to add the supplementary document to the constitution and that is bill of rights. This bill of rights states the additional rights such as freedom of religion and press, right to arms, quartering of soldiers, protection to the people during unreasonable searches and raids.
Initially, most settlers wanted to use the lands that became Kansas and Nebraska for <u>farms</u>.
<h3>
What Kansas and Nebraska?</h3>
The lands of Kansas and Nebraska were fertile for raising crops and doing agricultural activities. These lands were made available to settlers at no cost under Homestead Act.
Therefore, settlers started to use the timber for building homes and selling to <u>logging companies. </u>
<u></u>
Learn more about Kansas and Nebraska here:
brainly.com/question/949542
Answer:
"I see you, and I mean you no harm."
Explanation:
Erving Goffman was a sociologist and a social psychologist. He is considered as one of the most influential sociologist of America. His is well-known for the contribution to the social theory for his famous study of symbolic interaction.
He used symbolic interaction views to understand the society better by analyzing and understanding people's everyday behaviors and interaction.
In the context, according to Goffman's theory when two men crossing each other glances at each other and quickly passes silently conveys the message that both sees each other and they mean no harm to one another.
