Answer:
People like to call in and request to be anonymous because they know they are being nosy, or dramatic about a situation. Not always the reason though. But anonymous calls tend to have wrong information in them and can sometimes be completely false, and a way for one person to just try and get someone else in trouble. The problem with that is, you can't do a follow up depending on your department policy. Unless there is some sort of evidence, the person can't be charged, and by not having an available witness, it basically just makes the call a checkup to make sure no one is doing anything wrong.
No, unless a truly barbaric crime has occured, there should be no follow up. The caller wanted to be anonymous, so let them be anonymous unless they decide to come forward with more information.
Explanation:
Answer:Torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. Violations of the right to life, including murder and massacres, and extrajudicial and summary executions. Violations of the right to property, for example the destruction of houses and infrastructure.
Explanation:
<u>Impression as circumstantial evidence, class evidence, and non-circumstantial (individual) evidence:</u>
An impression collected from the crime scene can be analysed by the forensic expert and then the result of the analysis will be handed over the investigation officer. Where the officer will study the nature of crime and will come to a conclusion about how the impression can be classified.
The officer will classify the impression as individual evidence when it posses the individual characteristics. The evidence that has the class characteristics will be classified under class evidence. And then the circumstantial evidence which is grouping of evidence according to the crime scene. So, investigator will classify the impression according to the characteristics of the evidence.
Answer: he dont have the car
Explanation: cool question
