Answer:
The correct answer is A) they both describe the relationship of those in power over those not in power
Explanation:
A is correct answer because in both systems there are clear differences between those who are owing land and those who are working on it. In the feudal system, owner of the land (senior) is giving land for usage to his vassals, while peasants are doing all the hard work. It is the same in manorial system, peasants are practically dependent on the land they are working on, and sometimes are not even allowed to leave it.
B is not correct because these systems have nothing to do with education.
C is not correct, because there was practically no middle class in that period, especially in the feudal system.
For the answer to the question above, the first phase of the French Revolution took much inspiration from the works of Montesquieu, Thomas Jefferson, and John Locke, whose ideas the revolutionaries in America had also touted. Their ideas came to the fore in the early phases of the revolution, when the National Constituent Assembly replaced the absolute monarchy of the Ancien Régime with a constitutional monarchy, Montesquieu's favored system of government. In 1789, the same assembly passed "The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen," a document that draws deeply from the works of John Locke and from Thomas Jefferson's "Declaration of Independence."
Bolivar Simon ought to be considered the Spanish American equivalent of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. Like Washington, Bolívar<span> led a people onto the battlefield to gain independence. Like Jefferson, </span>Bolívar<span> drafted constitutions </span>inspired<span> by the ideas of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, so they are all connected. The one event inspired the other event</span>
Its A! the third branch is punish violators of the law.
It is clear to see that in an unequal society where there is a misallocation of wealth, the less fortunate will fight for their rights and for equality. The system ends up affecting these populations in a big way, for this reason, they end up uniting people from similar realities, such as union workers, lower middle class people, and mutual aid societies. What unites them is common interest: equality, social justice, better distribution of income, better wages, etc. The upper class society does not join this cause, because it does not generate any interest. This may affect their fortunes. That's why they tend to separate. When it comes to political parties, social interested play a important role on it too. It's always about the interests.
Assuming the war we're talking about is WWII, and also assuming home refers to the US, then the answer would be how the Japanese-Americans faced discrimination after Pearl Harbor because the American public was afraid of another attack so they felt that Japanese-Americans were aiding the Empire of Japan.