1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vadim26 [7]
3 years ago
15

City and state leaders have recognized a need to improve traffic along highways that pass through a major city. They have alread

y created a plan for future construction, and they have created a funding and taxation structure to pay for the project.
Construction has begun, but interruptions are happening throughout the project. This is causing heavy traffic throughout the city, making it even more difficult to carry out construction plans quickly.

The scenario reflects a delay in which part of the public policy process?

identifying a problem
developing a plan
implementing a plan
evaluating a plan
History
2 answers:
zlopas [31]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is Implementing a plan, I just got it right.

rewona [7]3 years ago
3 0

implementing a plan  


You might be interested in
What nation was blamed for World War I and made to pay the greatest price for its involvement?
Liono4ka [1.6K]
Germany.They were suppose to pay back all the debt and this caused inflation and extreme poverty in the country.
<span />
6 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is the best example of manifest destiny?
solmaris [256]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Manifest destiny they wanted to rule over the continent and needed more gunpower and civil partners.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
How can nationalism can lead to political conflict ?
statuscvo [17]

Answer: Nationalism can lead to political conflict that if someone from a different country has pride in their country but someone doesn't like that country that the other person has, this can cause political conflict and wars.

Explanation: For example, in a historic time person A likes and has pride in country A. Person B disagrees and likes and has pride in country B. If person A and B doesn't agree with either country A or B, it can result in political conflict and cause war. Either person A wins or person B wins.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is not a theme of Geography?
steposvetlana [31]
Human environmental intertaction

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Need help! Please and thank you
    10·1 answer
  • Paul wrote a1 and 2 Peter
    10·1 answer
  • Mark three ways the attitudes of the United States changed after World War I. It lost interest in progressive causes. It had mor
    8·1 answer
  • What prompted Indians to relocate to London and the United Kingdom?
    12·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP!! <br> Who made more contributions to society? Africa or Asia?
    11·2 answers
  • How do you think JROTC will be in 100 years?
    13·1 answer
  • Just wanna check my answer
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following examples of economic and social advances at the middle-class worked to gain
    8·1 answer
  • Explain why the four Greensboro students were not allowed to eat at the lunch counter.​
    12·1 answer
  • Easy question :3
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!