I would want a rewind button to go back and fix every mistake so my family can stop hating me and I can actually make them feel proud of me instead of them always being mad at me
Explanation:
Like what? Insert full picture. And by past job it means for you not for us as it would differ for every person or individual.
Answer:
The ability to open our minds to new ideas and experiences. The desire to learn new concepts, improve skills and seek challenges in pursuit of lifelong learning contributes to our intellectual wellness. Say if you want to be a Doctor, or an Artist. You have to go out and learn those things/requirements to become what you want to be and not what other's say what you shold be. Its all about your own mind set and what you think is best for you, you can go out and even be successful at a young age. All I gotta say is.. . Let your mind be free and reach your top goals, if something gets in your way you have to power through them. And keep on going.
Explanation:
An article published in 2013 by the American Psychological Association will be the best and the most credible source to be used in the paper. Thus, option D is correct.
<h3>What are credible sources?</h3>
Credible sources are informational platforms written by persons who are experts and have a particular field of knowledge. They can be cited in the papers as they are from credible authors and can be checked for accuracy of the facts.
The peer-reviewed journals and professional organizations are some of the reliable sources and provide the correct information. A recent article published in 2013 by the American Psychological Association is a credible source.
American Psychological Association is an organization that has experts and specializes in psychology studies. They will publish the most accurate data compared to the manufacturer, young adult, or the Department of Education.
Therefore, option D. American Psychological Association is the most credible source.
Learn more about credible sources here:
brainly.com/question/13945904
#SPJ1
The review of the argument of the writer is as follows:
- He makes use of the bandwagon fallacy when he talks about the statistics of people who said Daylight Savings has made them less productive.
- The argument would have been more convincing if he had made use of good supporting details.
<h3>What is an Argument?</h3>
This refers to the use of words and logic in order to convince a person about a given perspective or position on a particular topic.
Hence, we can see that the writer makes an argument to abolish Daylight Savings and tries to be forceful about it, without the use of proper supporting details.
He does not include the source of the research that talks about the 88% of workers who said Daylight Savings reduced their productivity, and he also made use of the bandwagon fallacy.
Read more about bandwagon fallacy here:
brainly.com/question/1058000
#SPJ1
