Answer:
The Shiites believed that only line of Ali and Fatima could lead while the Sunnis believed that any faithful male from Muhammad's (Peace be upon him) tribe could lead. Yah and most muslims are sunnis but we all are muslims after all and we belive in one god (Hope it helps)
Explanation:
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
The expense of making an additional shirt is know as the marginal cost. Hope this helps, good luck.
The correct answer is C.) the Americans forced British soldiers to retreat to Britain.
The Bedouin fall into two basic social classes. One class is known as the "true" Bedouin, and they live as nomadic shepherds. The other group has embraced farming and is known as the fellahin. The fellahin lead a more settled life on the edge of the desert.
