1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alja [10]
3 years ago
9

Explain how European settlements displaced native Americans and how this lead to conflict & war*

History
1 answer:
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
4 0

Im not 100 % sure but hope this helps!

the biggest conflict between Native Americans and European settlers was the issue of land ownership and land use. Europeans felt land should be privately owned, while Native Americans believed land should by owned and used by everyone.

They hoped to transform the tribes people into civilized Christians through their daily contacts. The Native Americans resented and resisted the colonists' attempts to change them. Their refusal to conform to European culture angered the colonists and hostilities soon broke out between the two groups.

________________

-Lexi

You might be interested in
Which statement describes a shared characteristic of Native American groups?
vfiekz [6]
Though cultural features, language, clothing, and customs vary enormously from one tribe to another, there are certain elements which are encountered frequently and shared by many tribes.
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is a correct implication of the author's argument?
kykrilka [37]

The executive power has grown thanks to the social perception of international crisis. Additionally, this has caused the three branches of public power to weaken.

The central theme of the text is the transformation that the central executive power of the United States has had, influenced by different factors such as:

  • Indochina War
  • Watergate case

These events have caused the presidency of the United States to acquire more power to make decisions. One of the important aspects of this transformation is international politics because the influence of the international crisis made the executive branch grow in importance.

This deepened an internal crisis between the balance of powers, because the executive branch acquired more power in foreign affairs and this situation is being projected onto the national scene of the United States.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/17905949

Note: This question is missing because the text is missing.

In the last years presidential primacy, so indispensable to the political order, has turned into presidential supremacy. The constitutional Presidency—as events so apparently disparate as the Indochina War and the Watergate affair showed, has become the imperial Presidency and threatens to be the revolutionary Presidency. . . . The imperial Presidency was essentially the creation of foreign policy. A combination of doctrines and emotions—belief in the permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world—had brought about the unprecedented centralization of decisions. Prolonged war in Vietnam strengthened the tendencies toward both centralization and exclusion. So the imperial Presidency grew at the expense of the constitutional order. Like the cowbird, it hatched its own eggs and pushed the others out of the nest. And, as it overwhelmed the traditional separation of powers in foreign affairs, it began to aspire toward an equivalent centralization of power in the domestic polity.

Learn more in:

3 0
3 years ago
How did Hinduism survive despite multiple invasions?.
aalyn [17]
Hinduism has survived because of many reasons such as its flexibility, not a standarded structure , how it had been mingled with social life, bakthi and warriors.
6 0
2 years ago
President Chester A. Arthur urged, “a liberal appropriation for the support of Indian schools” at twenty years later Henry Adams
Ierofanga [76]

The Russians created a new communist government that aligned with the Central Powers instead.

6 0
3 years ago
McCarthy noted that “we are engaged in a final, all out battle.” How did he characterize
sp2606 [1]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

McCarthy noted that “we are engaged in a final, all-out battle.” How did he characterize the two sides in the “battle”?

What Republican Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy did was to confront the American People by accusing that several members of the federal government and the US military had ties with Communists or were Communists.

Why do you think he portrayed the Cold War in this manner?

I think he was a cruel person with peculiar political ambitions because he did accuse people but never present a valid or serious argument or piece of evidence to support his claims. He only accused people, affecting their public image and reputation. And that was so wrong. However, he scared and alienated many citizens and made the federal government investigate the alleged cases.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were events in Europe related to the revolution in Latin
    7·1 answer
  • The only people who can introduce a bill are ___________.
    12·1 answer
  • What does a strict constructionist believe?
    5·1 answer
  •  Andrew Carnegie was a very successful entrepreneur and businessman in the late 1800s and early 1900s. He started the Carnegie S
    13·2 answers
  • Explain the significance of world war 2 as a turning point for US history
    12·1 answer
  • Of the four sections of Justinian's Code, Institutiones was meant for
    5·2 answers
  • What social change resulted from the Industrial Revolution?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these was a goal of the first European explorers?
    6·2 answers
  • Jerry is out driving one morning on I-90 had hits a pothole. Hitting the pothole causes Jerry to crash is Lamborghini into the r
    11·1 answer
  • Pretty please help asap!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!