1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semmy [17]
2 years ago
8

Help asap please

History
1 answer:
maxonik [38]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

yes because its better and its less work and thats what people want

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The colonists used word-of-mouth and printing to share the events leading to the Declaration of Independence; today we could use
Mnenie [13.5K]

The correct answer is True

Explanation:

During the period of colonization in America (from the 16th century to the 18th century in most territories), communication was mainly limited to print or written documents such as newspapers and letters, as well as, word-of-mouth communication. Due to this, important events including those related to the Declaration of Independence were communicated in these two ways.

This would not occur nowadays because the development of communication has expanded the possible mediums for communication. Indeed, nowadays this information could be sent using e-mail or spread through social media. According to this, the answer is True.

4 0
2 years ago
Source B:
Vadim26 [7]
Here is how it was explained to me. WW2 was blamed pretty much entirely in Hitler, yes obviously there were so many other factors, and decisions that made the total, destruction of everything, but everyone blames Hitler for the start of it all. In this passage though, it sounds like the blame is on the other political advisers, and his foreign minister. Like they were supposed to have pushed for more meetings, or tried to make Hitler see reason.

Hope that helps  
3 0
3 years ago
What consideration should a president make when negotiating a treaty
weqwewe [10]

A president should do good to both the parties of the negotiation, goals should be met and should come to an end where one country over powers the other.

<u>Explanation:</u>

While negotiating a treaty, the President of a country should make sure that all the purpose for which the treaty has been signed should be made met. When one country over powers the other, the treaty should not be signed. It should do good for the development of the country and to the citizens of the country.

8 0
2 years ago
Government VA McDonald's 35W
icang [17]

Answer:

US President, a battle was fought, support the war, made a worthy sacrifice

Explanation:

I got it right

7 0
2 years ago
Under what circumstances would a defendant be wise to settle out of court
antiseptic1488 [7]
<span>Sometimes a lawsuit is filed so that a plaintiff can satisfy a very personal or profound sense of right and wrong, or to make an important point that impacts more than the parties in the case. It would be under the circumstance when both or one party is interested in settlement that it would be wise to settle out of court to avoid further conflicts.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What job would you be expected to do in the war effort?
    14·1 answer
  • What is one way that imperialism affected the economic situations of colonial people?
    13·2 answers
  • What was Thomas malthus say about food supply and population control
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the 1 president
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the colonization movement flawed?
    7·1 answer
  • For what purpose was the Environmental Protection Agency established? A.)to write laws pertaining to environmental regulation B.
    9·2 answers
  • Who is the father of modern political science
    6·1 answer
  • Japan and Italy bowed out of negotiations before the Treaty of Versailles was complete
    12·1 answer
  • What were the main reasons for U.S.
    10·1 answer
  • The Vikings came from
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!