Answer:
(10, 4, -3)
Step-by-step explanation:
z = -3
y + z = 1
y - 3 = 1
y = 4
x + y - z = 17
x + 4 - -3 = 17
x + 4 + 3 = 17
x + 7 = 17
x = 10
(10, 4, -3)
Answer:
Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias </em>because its indicators taking values of 1 and 0 where 1 would represent taking action by the legal system and 0 would represent not taking action by the legal system. as
The researcher plans to regress national income per capita based on the effect of the legal system
applying the formula for addressing omitted variable bias ( attached below )
NAP = 180 - NAC - PAT = 180 - 61 - 46 = 119 - 46 = 73 degrees
Given that Relationship B has a lesser rate than Relationship A and that the graph representing Relationship A is a f<span><span>irst-quadrant graph showing a ray from the origin through the points
(2, 3) and (4, 6) where the horizontal axis label is Time in weeks and the vertical axis
label is Plant growth in inches.</span>
The rate of relationship A is given by the slope of the graph as follows:

To obtain which table could represent Relationship B, we check the slopes of the tables and see which has a lesser slope.
For table A.
Time (weeks) 3 6 8 10
Plant growth (in.) 2.25 4.5 6 7.5

For table B.
Time (weeks) 3 6 8 10
Plant growth (in.) 4.8 9.6 12.8 16
</span><span><span>

</span>
For tabe C.
Time (weeks) 3 4 6 9
Plant growth (in.) 5.4 7.2 10.8 16.2
</span><span>
For table D.
Time (weeks) 3 4 6 9
Plant growth (in.) 6.3 8.4 12.6 18.9</span>
<span>

</span>
Therefore, the table that could represent Relationship B is table A.