Answer: Catton's analysis on the two generals (General Grant and General Lee) focused on their contrasts and similarities.
Explanation: Although both generals were on opposing sides and had some fundamental differences, they had many similarities according to Catton's analysis which are:
1. They were both excellent fighters
2. Both have similar fighting techniques and qualities
3. Both were determined and loyal
4. Both were daring and resourceful
5. After the war, both quickly adjusted to the peace and were instrumental in bringing the two factions together quickly to form a unified nation.
Answer:
People were forced to live a nomadic lifestyle due to the rocky terrain and deserts.
Explanation:
I hope this helps! Have a great rest of your day!
Answer:
Streets and roads
Explanation:
The USA economy is a mixed market economy. It blends elements from the market economy with elements from planned economies.
Private ownership is prioritized ( free market economy) but the government has control over some public services such as healthcare (to an extend), physical infrastructure (the road system), education, national defense, the postal system, and some public lands.
The idea behind public ownership of these services is that they are better performed by the public than private enterprise.
The roads in the USA and their infrastructure are funded by taxes (especially the gas one), tolls, and user fees.
Answer:
Deforestation, and especially the destruction of rainforests, is a hugely significant contributor to climate change. Scientists estimate that forest loss and other changes to the use of land account for around 23% of current man-made CO2 emissions – which equates to 17% of the 100-year warming impact of all current greenhouse-gas emissions.
As children are taught at school, trees and other plants absorb CO2 from the air as they grow. Using energy from the sun, they turn the carbon captured from the CO2 molecules into building blocks for their trunks, branches and foliage. This is all part of the carbon cycle.
A mature forest doesn't necessarily absorb much more CO2 that it releases, however, because when each tree dies and either rots down or is burned, much of its stored carbon is released once again. In other words, in the context of climate change, the most important thing about mature forests is not that they reduce the amount of CO2 in the air but that they are huge reservoirs of stored carbon. If such a forest is burned or cleared then much of that carbon is released back into the atmosphere, adding to atmospheric CO2 levels.
Of course, the same process also works in reverse. If trees are planted where previously there weren't any, they will on soak up CO2 as they grow, reducing the amount of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. It is thought that trees, plants and other land-based "carbon sinks" currently soak up more than a quarter of all the CO2 that humans add to the air each year – though that figure could change as the planet warms.
Unsurprisingly, the relationship between trees and local and global temperature is more complicated than the simple question of the greenhouse gases they absorb and emit. Forests have a major impact on local weather systems and can also affect the amount of sunlight absorbed by the planet: a new area of trees in a snowy region may create more warming than cooling overall by darkening the land surface and reducing the amount of sunlight reflected back to space.
Explanation:
I think is that there is still racism,and people still fight over things which is protesting, and there is violence with people and a lot of vandilsm
(Sorry if i spelled something wrong)
