1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
3 years ago
8

Write two things you learned about the Inca architecture?

History
1 answer:
Rom4ik [11]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:Rectangular buildings could be grouped in threes (or more) and arranged around an open but walled courtyard or patio, perhaps the most common Inca arrangement of buildings. This mini-complex is known as a kancha and functioned as administrative buildings, workshops, temples, accommodation or a mix of these. Very large buildings are known as a kallanka and these typically have several doors and face a large open space, often (once again) trapezoid in layout. They were probably used for public gatherings and as accommodation for representatives of the Inca administration and were clear public symbols of imperial control. Palaces were similar in design to smaller buildings just on a larger scale, with finer stonework and very often walled to restrict access and the viewing of royal personages.

The vast majority of Inca buildings were rectangular and most of these had a single entrance and were composed of only one room as dividing walls are not common in Inca design. There are some rare examples of multiple-doored long rectangular structures and even buildings which were circular or U-shaped but the norm was for straight-walled structures. Most buildings had only a single storey but there are some structures with two, especially those built into hillsides and the more impressive imperial structures at the capital Cuzco where sometimes there are examples of three-storey buildings.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When and where did this speech take place? What was Churchill’s purpose?
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
Do you know what the speech is or what its about?<span />
7 0
3 years ago
How did European colonization of other countries change the world and how does it still affect us today. (I'm looking for two ve
Nikitich [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You did not include any context or reference to try to give you two specific things. However, we can help to comment on the following.

European colonization of other countries changed the world in these two important things. First, evangelization. Native Indians used to have their own spiritual beliefs in which mother nature had a prominent figure of honor and respect. When European colonizers arrived at the North American territory, in the case of the English, or at Mesoamerica, as was the case of the Spanish, they evangelized the Indians in the Christian religion.

The other important change was the settling of white European who had a different culture and customs than the Native Indians. White settlers wanted more land to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources in the Americas for a profit. The Indians had a different vision regarding nature.

We even can add another consequence from the presence of Europeans in the Americas. The many diseases they brought that almost wipe out 80% of the Indian population in the continent. Diseases such as malaria, influenza, smallpox, chickenpox, or cholera.

All of these affect us today, because Christianity in ist many forms, is the predominant religion in North America. In Latin America, Catholicism is the predominant religion.

Regarding the exploitation of natural resources and raw materials, modern multinational companies still exploit and affect the environment in many regions of the continent.

4 0
3 years ago
Why was pope leo III’s crowning of charlemagne significant?
Ket [755]

Answer:

Pope Leo III's crowning of Charlemagne in 800 AD was significant because it gave papal legitimacy to Charlemagne's new role as emperor.

Explanation:

comment if it helps

3 0
4 years ago
After reading the article below, cite evidence from the article to support the idea that the industrial Revolution played a majo
liraira [26]

Answer:

The Europeans did not consider the indigenous, or native, peoples to be civilized, or in some cases fully human. European imperialists justified their conquests by calling them civilizing missions. Many believed that they were doing the natives a favor by teaching them about Western society and that it was their mission to civilize the “uncivilized.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5.
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

Silk Road since there was an interconnection between lands this helped bring spices to the countries which also formed religions and then brought new philisophy ideas alive.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Compose a paragraph that analyzes Galileo’s purpose in writing The Dialogue and society’s response to his work.
    10·2 answers
  • Which speaker most likely represents an economic interest group?
    15·2 answers
  • What brought an end to the kingdom of Rome
    10·1 answer
  • The Roman Empire created the world's first
    9·2 answers
  • America's national government between 1776 and 1781 was the
    8·1 answer
  • what were three outcomes of the Battle of Gettysburg ?why is Gettysburg still remembered as a turning point in the Civil War?
    14·2 answers
  • In the years that followed Georgia's Trustee Period, during which control was transferred back to the British king, the colony e
    5·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the 26th amendment ?
    13·1 answer
  • Who introduced the doctrine of lapse?
    15·1 answer
  • How did cultural groups influence central Edo list at least two positive affects and two negative effects on cultural diffusion
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!