All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following was a direct result of the industrialization that began in the early 1900s?

History

2 answers:

salantis [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

A: Urbanization

Explanation:

The first half of the 20th century, until the Second World War, is a transition stage between the "primitive" industrial city and the formation of the extensive and multiform metropolitan areas. The dense and compact industrial city model begins to change as soon as the possibilities of intra-urban, collective and private transport are created and expanded.

In the history of the city, the moments and fragments planned and those developed spontaneously or organically are altered and superimposed.

The extensive growth of large cities has not been the only phenomenon of urban change operated throughout the century. The most relevant transformation has been the change of scale experienced in the urban system, producing a process of expansion that has not only overflowed the traditional administrative limits, but has also invaded entire regions.

The revolution in transport, fruit of the irruption, first, of the metropolitan railroads and, later, of the generalization of the use of the automobile, allowed the progressive separation of the residence and the work, generating an unstoppable process of suburbanization.

The dynamics of the metropolis throughout the twentieth century has appeared an infinite growth. However, most urban analysts sensed, already in the mid-1970s, signs of depletion in the growth of large urban agglomerations.

garri49 [273]3 years ago

3 0

Industrialization leads to Urbanization. It created a economic growth and job opportunities that drew people to the cities. So A is the answer I believe

You might be interested in

Germany, Italy, and Japan built up their militaries to:

Gnesinka [82]

They built them up for territorial conquests. They also needed to be prepared for war as they challenged the power of nations like Britain and the United States.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Republicans argued that high tariffs would A. allow American industries to grow. B. lead to a loss of manufacturing jobs. C. inc

Sergio039 [100]

I believe the answer is A. allow American industries to grow

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did India evolve into a market economy?

ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

Explanation:

Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) shows how efficiently you are using capital in a country. Until a few years ago, the ICOR in India was as high as 4, meaning that it will take four units of capital to produce one unit of output. As of yesterday, it was 3.6.

Investment in India has been around $2.5-4 billion in the last two years compared to at least $25 billion in China. China is growing around 9% and India is growing around 6%. With 1/10 of China’s investment, how can India continue to grow at this pace? Some have concluded that China has become less efficient. If India has to grow at 9% it would need 36% investment. India’s saving rate is only at 25% now so it does need outside investment and that is why the government is compelled to continue with market friendly policies.

On the other hand, there is a viewpoint that the Chinese government is saying they are flush in investment, but this is only in a few sectors and in a few cities and this has caused them to become inefficient in those areas. They need to drive the investment into other provinces.

What you have now is 10 years of the first generation of reform leading up to 2000 resulting in an economy that is much more open, restrictions on the operations of the private sector have mostly been removed, and the number of licenses and requirements have been simplified. The fact that the economy is exporting more in one month than it used to in a year shows that this is happening.

In the second generation of reforms, the federal government realized it had a number of disincentives for province level exports. One of these was that when an entity from an individual, province-owned enterprise exported something, the revenue would go to the federal government and then the federal government would distribute this to the provinces based on need and merit. So there was no incentive for province-owned companies to export. This has changed. The federal government now wants to nurture a big brother relationship but essentially as a way to delegate more decisional latitude to the provincial government.

The central government has also started working on major projects. For example, most analysts believe that if India would fix its infrastructure problems the GDP would grow by at least 2%. Power structure reforms alone could grow it by 1 to 1-1/2 %. The central government has laid out in its financial for the next 20 years, and are planning half a trillion dollars in investment in infrastructure development. Typically, the problem in infrastructure in the last ten years is that return on investment is low and takes a long time to mature. The government has realized that it must have at least a 25% stake in each of the infrastructure projects to ensure domestic and foreign investors that the project will go forward. They have a series of programs. One on the highway side is BOLT (Build On Lease Transfer) in which they are incentivizing foreign companies to invest in roadways and then they can make them toll roads to recover their investment. Civilian aviation, ports, and electricity have also been the subject of these kinds of deals.

The World Bank, which had almost ceased lending to India 4 or 5 years ago, came back this year and said they not only wanted to resume investments but also wanted to increase them, to the total amount of $3.5 billion, particularly in infrastructure. The federal government has said do not give the money to us, it should be given directly to the projects that are going on and do it in installments based on the World Bank conditions as the project is successfully completed. An example is the building of the national highway system. The government calculates how much of the highway is passing through each district. To the district magistrate (bureaucrat) they are given identical specifications and then telling them to invite tenders and build their part of the highway. This was a way to allow the building of the system without starting at one point and working to the end. It allows the simultaneous building of the system. Quality tests are done to ensure that it is all of the same quality.

4 0

3 years ago

When advocates of bimetallism referred to the crime of '73, they were talking about the financial panic that hit the united stat

RSB [31]

The correct answer is:

The decision by Congress in 1873 to stop buying and minting silver.

The Coinage Act of 1873, signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant, was a general reform of the laws associated with the Mint of the United States.

The act was later criticized by advocates of bimetallism as the "Crime of '73" because it ended bimetallism in the United States, by setting the nation on the gold standard.

5 0

3 years ago

Read the summary.During the Renaissance, humanism placed a great emphasis on learning and self-improvement (1). The Catholic Chu

soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

(3). Yet, libraries did not exist until the 19th century, which slowed progress for peasants and the poor

Explanation:

The renaissance period was a period from the 14th to 17th centuries that humanist views became quite popular. It was a period of rebirth in European culture, economy and politics. Individuals became open minded, curious, creative, and innovative. There was wide spread desire to learn new things as the popular humanistic views of this time brought more wealth and security during this period. However libraries did not exist till the 19th century. This is seen to contradict or critique the preceding summaries above as increased learning should have meant more libraries.

6 0

3 years ago