I believe it was, "<span>Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong." But I'm not quite sure. </span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Congressman has to respond to the Big Pizza Lobby taking these considerations in mind.
Congressman has to realize the impact of the presence of this big "company" in the market. Not only for other industries that cannot compete with this huge company but the impact it has on consumers.
The congressman would propose the kind of bill that benefits free trade, competence, and benefits consumers in a free market.
The big company is not going to stay "arms-folded." The company is going to hire lobbyists to negotiate with congressmen in order to promote its particular agendas and personal interests.
Of course, the big company wants to change the rules against it, and modify them to facilitate their interests. The negotiations can make legislators doubt or rethink a regulation. That is when Congressman has to think to support the interests of citizens, who were the ones who took him/her to office in the elections. So congressmen serve the people, not large companies.
Randomization is the process of making something random; in various contexts this involves, for example: generating a random permutation of a sequence (such as when shuffling cards); selecting a random sample of a population (important in statistical sampling
Two emerging factors after the War of 1812 that contributed to development of sectionalism were "an increase in the number of men voting" and "the concept of manifest destiny," since both of these led to a more "aggressive" nation that was becoming more and more divided on how to exploit that aggression.
<span>The missing text is "social learning theory". This theory indicates that the development of the genre has much to do with the imitation of the role models, in this case Sue's mother, she is the closest example of femininity that her daughter has. Sue will continue imitating her mother in all she can.</span>
