Most likely taxes because all the other answers are things that people desire for/of their government, although economics could also be a potential answer, but I’m leaning towards taxes
Answer:
"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."
Explanation:
Except when reaching an intersection with a green light
The correct option is D. Managing office politics falls under the main HR manager's responsibility of employee advocacy.
Office politics can be stopped from becoming toxic through human resources. In actuality, HR is ideally suited to promote a joyful and effective workplace. The impact of office politics should be kept to a minimum.
<h3>How does workplace politics occur in an organization?</h3>
Office politics develops when staff members abuse their authority to attract unwarranted attention and popularity at work. Employees engage in office politics just to harm the reputation of a colleague in order to get advantages and win favor with their superiors.
The complicated social structure of a workplace is referred to as office politics. It involves employees pursuing their own objectives by abusing their positions of authority, influence, and delegation. Everyone has a unique job to play within the microcosm of any business.
Learn more about HR manager responsibility here:
brainly.com/question/25806768
#SPJ1
Answer: Strict Scrutiny
Explanation:
Strict Scrutiny can be defined as the highest form of judicial review,
which court uses to determine whether some certain laws are within the constitution. Strict scrutiny is widely and mostly used by the competent court of law when the government is sued by the accuser. The law also establishes a ban on some contents, which includes writing of threats to the President of the United States.
