Answer:
Option c is the correct answer.
Thank you...pls mark it as the brainliest
Answer:
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.
Explanation:
Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.
And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.
Yes because if the car is old and gets totaled you would want insurance to get some money back from your old car to put towards a new one
Yes Because its your fault your gonna need to pay for their damages. ( i live in Florida so ion know much bout that cause we a no fault state )
Answer:
Specific deterrence prevents crime by frightening an individual defendant with punishment. ... Incapacitation prevents crime by removing a defendant from society. Rehabilitation prevents crime by altering a defendant's behavior. Retribution prevents crime by giving victims or society a feeling of avengement.
Explanation:
mark brainliest plss plss plss╥﹏╥╥﹏╥╥﹏╥╥﹏╥
Answer:
I believe that the answer is A
