The strengths of dispute resolution strategies are that dispute resolution rarely results in arrests and is less expensive than adjudication, and focuses on resolving miscommunication and misunderstanding issues.
<h3>What is dispute resolution?</h3>
Dispute resolution is a strategy to resolve differences between two or more groups regarding an issue peacefully and through dialogue.
This method is considered the most appropriate for solving problems because it prevents disputes from ending in violent confrontations and one of those involved being injured or killed. On the contrary, this method ensures that all parties involved get their demands or needs.
According to the above, it can be inferred that as a result of dispute resolution costs can be reduced, number of arrests and it is a way to clarify the message that each one wants to express.
Learn more about communication in: brainly.com/question/22558440
#SPJ1
Answer:
It means that the best way to pull an economy out of a recession is for the government to increase demand by infusing the economy with capital—by spending, in short. If it has to borrow money—go into debt and increase the deficit—to do so, it should.
Explanation:
Answer:
It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.
Explanation:
For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.
This statement is false.
Since the middle of the 1960s, the expansion of social welfare programs has been a major concern for American domestic politics.
Conservatives criticized the continuous growth of these programs, saying it had put an unacceptably high cost on the American taxpayers while doing little to help the poor's long-term concerns.
Reagan quickly slowed the rate of growth in domestic spending after being elected president in 1980 in part due to dissatisfaction with social programs.
Reagan has maintained that his budget-cutting initiatives are primarily intended to benefit low-income people who have been able to generate significant incomes by fusing their work-related gains with federal funding and "inkind" benefits.
The "really needy"—those with the lowest incomes—would be exempt from budget cuts. In February 1981, Reagan remarked, "Those who, through no fault of their own, must depend on the rest of us, the poor, the handicapped, the aged, all those with actual need, can rest confident that the social safety net of programs they depend on are exempt from any reduction."
To know more about Reagan, visit:
brainly.com/question/4784629
#SPJ4
