1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Salsk061 [2.6K]
2 years ago
12

Which tool of monetary policy allows the Federal Reserve to decrease the

Business
2 answers:
mihalych1998 [28]2 years ago
6 0
It's D. Increasing the reserve requirement on banks
-BARSIC- [3]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

d

Explanation:

a.p.e.x

You might be interested in
Keith and Dena Diem have personal property coverage with a​ $250 limit on​ currency, a​ $1,000 limit on​ jewelry, and a​ $2,500
netineya [11]

Answer:

Total Claim = $2416

Explanation:

The coverage on the currency = $250

The coverage on the jewelry = $1000

The limit on the gold, pewter, and silver = $2500

The amount that is stolen:

The amount of cash = $270

The worth of jewelry = $1734

Pewterware = $1666

The miximum coverage = 250 + 1000 + 2500 = $3750

Actual loss = 270 + 1734 + 1666 = $3670

Reimbursement amount = 250 + 1000 + 1666 = $2916

Total Claim = Total Amount Covered – Deductible  

Total Claim = $2916 - $500 = $2416

4 0
3 years ago
At the end of the year, Sheffield Co. has pretax financial income of $616,000. Included in the $616,000 is $78,400 interest inco
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

$173,820

Explanation:

pretax financial income $616,000

- interest income on municipal bonds ($78,400)

+ depreciation ($67,200 - $50,400) = $16,800

+ fine for dumping hazardous materials $25,000

taxable income = $579,400

income taxes payable = $579,400 x 30% = $173,820

Fines are not tax deductible, and since depreciation for tax purposes is lower than accounting depreciation, you must add them. But since municipal bonds are not taxable, they must be subtracted.

3 0
3 years ago
George is offered an investment opportunity by his friend Ray. He asks George for $6,900 and offers to repay him $12,990 after a
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

Depositing in bank is a better option.

Explanation:

For this solution, we can either determine the interest rate given to George by his one of the friend or the future worth method,

Future worth method is used here,

Given that,

PV = $6,900

R = 9%

N = 10 Years

FV = PV\times(1+R)^{N}

FV = 6,900\times(1+0.09)^{10}

FV = 6,900\times(1.09)^{10}

FV = 6,900 × 2.3673

FV = $16,334.81

Since, the future worth of investing in bank is more than the money to be offered by the George's friend (16,334.81 > 12,900) and hence, depositing in bank is a better option.

8 0
3 years ago
Under a partial release clause, a lender:
Lelechka [254]
D. Removes the lien from part of the property when part of the debt has been paid. This clause is used in commercial loans to allow a developer to repay part of the debt to remove the lien on part of the property. It is negotiated for agreed-upon payments to free multiple parcels of property separately to encourage development. 
3 0
3 years ago
Cray Research sold a super computer to the Max Planck Institute in Germany on credit and invoiced €10 million payable insix mont
Reil [10]

Answer:

a) The expected loss from the forward hedging = $432,900

b) No I wouldn’t recommend hedging the euro receivable based on the fact that the future spot rate is better off than the forward exchange rate.  

c) No I wouldn’t because in any case whether you hedge or not there will be no difference.

Explanation:

Solution.

Forward Exchange Rate = $1.10/€, therefore the equivalent of €10 million receivable from Germany in 6-month time = €10 million / Forward exchange rate ($1.10) = $9,090,909

However, the 6 months spot rate is $1.05/€, therefore if we simply wait till 6 months we will receive €10 million / Forward spot rate ($1.05) = $9,523,809.

a) The expected loss from the forward hedging = $9,523,809 - $9,523,809 = $432,900

b) No I wouldn’t recommend hedging the euro receivable based on the fact that the future spot rate is better off than the forward exchange rate.  

c) No I wouldn’t because in any case whether you hedge or not there will be no difference. You’ll just end up paying hedging fees which will impact on profits adversely.  

However it is always advisable to hedge foreign exchange risks because predictions could differ from reality and adverse movements in exchange rates could carry significant financial consequences which may not be comparable to the hedging costs.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Crowding out occurs when deficit spending increases interest rates. decreases interest rates. increases consumer spending. decre
    14·1 answer
  • Some companies use automated payment processing technology in which paper checks that may arrive at a lockbox are converted into
    11·1 answer
  • If your uncle borrows $56,000 from the bank at 10 percent interest over the eight-year life of the loan. Use Appendix D for an a
    8·1 answer
  • Ponzi Products produced 100 chain-letter kits this quarter, resulting in a total cash outlay of $10 per unit. It will sell 50 of
    5·1 answer
  • Which items are consequences of globalized trade for a developed nation that begins to import more goods and services from less-
    10·1 answer
  • Nevada company paid to the state $1,800 in sales tax that it had previously collected from customers. what type of transaction w
    11·1 answer
  • Jake’s Market recorded the following events involving a recent purchase of merchandise: Received goods for $60000, terms 2/10, n
    5·2 answers
  • Lucky Company's direct labor information for the month of February is as follows: Actual direct labor hours worked (AQ) 61,500 S
    5·1 answer
  • In the market for labor, demand describes
    6·1 answer
  • When pitching your budget to decision makers, focus on conveying two things: First, demonstrate ROI from the current year, and s
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!