A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all‐things‐considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. We cannot know what "good" is unless there is "evil" to contrast it with. (1) Doesn't justify all kinds of evil (Do we need genocide to know what goodness is?), (2) Doesn't justify the amount of evil (Do we need so much killing/theft to know what goodness is?), (3) God can know good/evil prior to creation/evil.
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Answer:
The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution because key states refused to ratify the Constitution unless it was added.
Explanation:
The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten additional articles to the United States Constitution. In the context of a free and democratic society - based on the values of the Enlightenment - these guarantee the inhabitants certain inalienable fundamental rights. The Bill of Rights was adopted by the US Congress on September 25, 1789 and ratified by 11 states. This process was completed on 15 December 1791.
The special meaning of the Bill of Rights results from the connection with the principle of the constitutional jurisdiction, that is, the rights are enforceable of each person before each court of the federation or a federal state, in the last instance before the Supreme Court, also opposite the state Legislators who did not act constitutionally.
Answer: <em>Escalation of commitment</em>
Explanation:
From the given case/scenario, we can state that this is an example of escalation of commitment. Escalation of commitment is referred as a behavior pattern under which a group or an individual that is facing exponentially negative result from an/a action, decision, or investment still tends to continue the path instead of changing course.
Answer:
Members of congress.
Explanation:
As it is known that framers has placed their work about the said topic that the court has to follow the majority's preference especially in types of societies we find ourselves. In as much as they were smart and visionaries, a lot about the people are been asked to be in consideration in rulings. E.g Privacy is seen to put in here as identity theft is random and also medical histories are private and need not be shared with the general public as it is seen to come to financial records. Therefore congress members are seen to be less oportuned here.
