Answer:
King Philip II of Spain was, personality-wise, less cautious than Elizabeth I of England. He sought a more active foreign policy, in part because he had to, since he was not only a king, but the emperor of a huge Spanish Empire that included territories all over the world.
King Philip was a devout catholic who saw himself as a defender of the Pope, and as a leader of the counter-reformation. His anti-protestanism was one of his motivations for invading England in 1588.
Elizabeth I was more reserved, in part because he did not have as much power as Philip II. She was the king of a small island-country, not the empress of a transoceanic empire. She was relatively tolerant of other religiouns while being anglican herself.
She did not had a lot military success until the Anglo-English war when her army defeated the Spanish Armada.
Localization of function; primarily where production of speech occurred (Broca's area) and where language was understood (Wernicke's area)
The primary reason why the Articles o Confederation were adopted were because states were very much independent and didn't want a central power controlling them. This became unsustainable however when it came time to pay back war debts. Then came the Constitution.
Religious Feast (Fasting is one of the pillars) but it depends on the context of the question. The pillar itself is fasting
Pilgrimage is also a pillar but doensnt have to be during ramadan
