Answer:
D. Zeta prevails, but only if the assignment is signed and in writing
Explanation:
Zeta prevails but only if the assignment is in writing and is signed.
If the assignment is express thereby and is signed by the parties in contract , then zeta can demand the amount from willy. Without any written consent and permission , willy cannot enforce the payment to zeta.
This is the best option in this case .
Answer: im not sure don't use my answer.
Explanation: CAHS CASH CASH
Have a clear description of what exactly your product or service is going to be and how you plan to accomplish your set goals.
Focus on what target market your product is for.
Describe the benefits of this product
Have other people offer proof to how good the product is
Make the description easy to read and understand.
Answer:
the depreciation expense on the equipment will be 1,785 for tax purpose.
Explanation:
We will look into the MACRS (Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System)
table for a property of seven years placen into service in the 4th quarter:
Which give us 3.57%
now we multiply the basis by the coefficient and get the value for depreciation
50,000 x 3.57% = 1,785 depreciation expense under MACRS
Answer: No. It does not violate Title VII if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Cynthia, requested a two-week leave from her employer to go on a religious pilgrimage and that the pilgrimage was not a requirement of her religion, but Cynthia felt it was a calling from God.
Based on the scenario, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave. According to the court, when an employee says that based on his or her religious belief, he or she is required to go to a pilgrimage, the person has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
In this case, her church which is the Roman Catholic didn't call for a pilgrimage as it was her personal choice. Therefore, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
