Answer:
second one is the correct answer
Answer:
didn't they offer them a deal
Explanation:
The answer is option 4: <u>He believed in the absolute power of kings.</u>
The England King James I (who ruled from 1603 to1625) clashed with the Parliament's ideas several times for his persistent belief in the absolute power of kings, justified for their divine right, which enabled him to rule over all their subjects without interference from anyone. Instead, the Parliament believed that the King must not rule alone, doing all that he pleased.
They both had very different views on how royal finances had to be handled as well as foreign affairs, for example, the Parliament members held that tax collection was an issue that had to be approved by them in order to improve the crown's finances, which had been seriously weakened by the long war with Spain (1585-1604), as for James I, he wanted to collect the taxes on his own, whose purpose wasn't only to improve the government but also to over-spend on his luxury way of living.
He Great Compromise was forged in a heated dispute during the 1787 Constitutional Convention: States with larger populations wanted congressional representation based on population, while smaller states demanded equal
In place of Roosevelt, another person who becomes president might equally divide its resources between the Pacific and Europe. Option C is correct.
<h2>
President Roosevelt:</h2>
- He was the president of America during WW II. He faced the attacks of Japan and Germany.
- Roosevelt was neutral during the great depression. But war started with Pearl Harbor Attack.
- Roosevelt collaborated with Britain and the Soviet union To defeat the Nazis.
- Rosevelt later attacks Japan.
Therefore, in place of Roosevelt, another person who becomes president he might equally divide its resources between the Pacific and Europe.
Learn more about President Roosevelt:
brainly.com/question/7067005
