I will help If you answer this one thing. Are yuou a K12 student?
Juan attributes his high score on a difficult exam to his intelligence, based on attribution theory.
<h3 /><h3>What is Attribution theory?</h3>
It corresponds to a psychological theory that justifies how the individual is able to interpret everyday situations internally and externally, that is, to judge how their behavior and the behavior of other individuals occur.
Therefore, Juan used internal attribution, that is, a skill, as a factor that justified his test score.
Find out more about Attribution theory here:
brainly.com/question/6654060
Answer:
B. The growing threat of the former Soviet Union and world communism.
Explanation:
The U.S. signed the many treaties in order to ensure peace. There was an increasing threat of the soviet union and there was a lot of tension between the two nations, a lot of it due to communism. Those treaties didn't work for long because just 2 years later, the cold war broke out.
Answer:
This question is incomplete. It is missing names and descriptions of the court cases descriptions that are needed to be matched. Here they are (correctly matched):
<em>Tape v. Hurley: </em><em>The California Supreme Court forced San Francisco to admit Chinese students into public schools.
</em>
- This case ended in <u>March 1885</u>, with the Supreme Court decision that refusal to admit a Chinese American student Mamie Tape to the all-white Spring Valley School was unlawful. This was a landmark court case.
<em>United States v. Wong Kim Ark: </em><em>The Supreme Court ruled the Fourteenth Amendment awarded citizenship to children of Chinese immigrants born on American soil.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>March 28, 1898</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco in 1873 to Chinese couple, was unlawfully denied entry to the United States after his trip abroad.
<em>Yick Wo v. Hopkins:</em><em> The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the city of San Francisco to grant licenses to Chinese laundries.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>May 10, 1886</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that the administration of law in a discriminating manner is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In particular, here out of 200 applications, only one permit to operate a wooden building laundry was granted to a Chinese owner, while all non-Chinese owners always received permits.