Answer:
B. The width of the confidence interval would be smaller.
Step-by-step explanation:
By reducing the confidence level from 99% to 95%, the student assumes that there is more uncertainty about the new confidence interval than the previous one. That, being said, since the results aren't as certain, the confidence interval is widened towards a central average point because the new interval isn't as accurate.
Therefore, the answer is B. The width of the confidence interval would be smaller.
No 2/3 is not equivalent to 5/6
please can i have a brainliest
Answer:
<em>n</em> - <em>k</em> + 1
Step-by-step explanation:
This is assuming (because you did not say) that <em>n</em> and <em>k</em> are integers and <em>n</em> is greater than <em>k</em>.
Example: from 2 to 5 {2, 3, 4, 5} includes 5 - 2 + 1 = 4 numbers.
Example: from -6 to 4 includes 4 - (-6) + 1 = 11 numbers, namely {-6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}
Let's use a for number of days when he shot 50 shots and b for number of days when he shot 100 shots.
We have:
a + b = 20
We also know that he shot total of 1250 shots:
50a + 100 b = 1250
We have two equations. We can solve them for a and b. Let's rearange first equation for a:
a= 20 - b
We insert this into second equation:
50 * (20 - b ) + 100b = 1250
1000 - 50b + 100b = 1250
50b = 250
b = 5
a = 20 - 5
a = 15
Mark shot 100 shots on 5 days.
Answer:
i think it's B, no solutions
Step-by-step explanation:
because they are parallel to each other
