The answer for this would be ALTRUISM. This is when someone shows a helping behavior voluntarily for the benefit of another person without expecting something in return. In short, this is showing selfless concern for others even if it means risking one's safety. Hope this helps.
Answer:
- 'The law is "narrowly tailored" to achieve the compelling purpose, and uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.'
Explanation:
As per 'strict scrutiny analysis,' in order to illustrate that a specific government action is constitutionally accurate, the government requires to demonstrate that the law is closely adapted in order to attain the compelling purpose by employing 'fewer conditional sources' that helps in attaining the desired purpose. Basically, the government needs to prove that the action is necessary to achieve the goal.
Answer:
A. Meta-conflict
Explanation:
Meta-conflict is about whether or how to engage in conflict. In case of conflict between Jon and Ana, they further tend to engage in conflict rather than ease it off. "You don't know" is the negation of Ana who does not disagree without losing her temper. Ana, on the other hand, is ready to "confront the issue" which means she is prepared to escalate the conflict. Ana does not believe in avoiding issue, the first lesson in easing conflict. Jon accuses Ana and Ana is ready to confront.
The correct answer is Job B has a lower salary than job A, but the benefits make job B a more attractive pay package
The comparison is similar to the metaphor used to demonstrate qualities or actions of elements.
The people hold political power in a democracy.
