The Roman legions, which were columns of roughly five-thousand men a piece, were greatly beneficial to the Romans because they were able to maneuver more freely around enemy forces, which were usually condensed into a single unit.
<span />
well, when u think of disputes, you think of an argument or disagreement, in this case its a disagreement on the countries, why? because of the relative locations, I hope i could help in this situation, it was hard for me, mostly because i couldn't understand it! (Friend me if you want, that would be nice)
Answer: There wasn't any.
Explanation:
The Emancipation Proclamation only freed the slaves that were in rebelling states. It didn't free the slaves in the North or effect the border states at all.
The correct answer is "required all goods imported into Britain or the colonies to be shipped in British vessels."
The Navigation Act of 1651 required all goods imported into Britain or the colonies to be shipped in British vessels.
The English Navigation Acts acts heavily taxed goods shipped in the southern colonies and countries other than England.
The English monarchy wanted to exert control over the 13 colonies and get some funds to pay the debts of war, by collecting taxes. There were many taxes in those years. But specifically, the Navigation Acts were a series of English laws that controlled shipping and trade from the English colonies to other countries, limiting the participation of foreign people in commerce with the colonies. The Navigation Acts were passed in 1663, 1673, and 1696.
Answer:
To a considerable extent.
Explanation:
The 20th century saw the growth of America as a global power. Before WW2, her influence was most keenly felt in Central and South America, which had been the case since the Monroe Doctrine. They also had a colonial relationship with the Philippines during this period.
After WW2, intervention in US foreign policy replaced isolationism as the need was felt to contain communism and the Soviet Union, and after 1949 China. This led to far greater involvement in European affairs and direct military action in Korea and Vietnam.
The USA also became involved in conflicts in Africa as well as the Arab-Israeli conflict, backing nationalist movements and governments which were seen as friendly.
Were these relations imperialist. Yes in that they were not based on an equitable distribution of power between the USA and those she supported. American self-interest, both politically and economically was at the forefront of US foreign policy throughout the 20th century.
Examples would include the overthrowal of the Mossadeq government in Iran in the 50's to secure Iranian oil, and the same in Chile in 1973 when the Allende government was replaced in a CIA organized coup by a brutal military dictatorship again to protect US economic interests. The US also supported the Mafia backed Batista dictatorship in Cuba, and right wing death squads in El Salvador and Honduras in the 70's.
US involvement in Vietnam and indeed the illegal bombing and invasion of Cambodia is a litany of disastrous decisions to protect US interests and the heroin coming out of The Golden Triangle through US army customs. The list is endless.
