1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalija [7]
2 years ago
5

What did I do please tell me you delete your commit so don't go and saying something if you're going to delete it

History
1 answer:
GalinKa [24]2 years ago
4 0
If you say that you’re not sure how to answer their question it’s an unreasonable answer, therefore it gets taken down :)
You might be interested in
How did colonist in the 1600's provide for their basic needs?<br> please help!!!???
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America. In 1564, for example, French Protestants (Huguenots) built a colony near what is now Jacksonville, Florida. This intrusion did not go unnoticed by the Spanish, who had previously claimed the region. The next year, the Spanish established a military post at St. Augustine; Spanish troops soon wiped out the French interlopers residing but 40 miles away.

Meanwhile, Basque, English, and French fishing fleets became regular visitors to the coasts from Newfoundland to Cape Cod. Some of these fishing fleets even set up semi-permanent camps on the coasts to dry their catches and to trade with local Indians, exchanging furs for manufactured goods. For the next two decades, Europeans' presence in North America was limited to these semi-permanent incursions. Then in the 1580s, the English tried to plant a permanent colony on Roanoke Island (on the outer banks of present-day North Carolina), but their effort was short-lived.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.

There is another very important point to keep in mind:  European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Indian control and settlement of that land looked different to European, as compared to Indian, eyes. Nonetheless, Indian groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion. That the Indians were unsuccessful in the long run in resisting or in establishing a more favorable accommodation with the Europeans was as much the result of the impact on Indians of European diseases as superior force of arms. Moreover, to view the situation from Indian perspectives ("facing east from Indian country," in historian Daniel K. Richter's wonderful phrase) is essential in understanding the complex interaction of these very different peoples.

Finally, it is also important to keep in mind that yet a third group of people--in this case Africans--played an active role in the European invasion (or colonization) of the western hemisphere. From the very beginning, Europeans' attempts to establish colonies in the western hemisphere foundered on the lack of laborers to do the hard work of colony-building. The Spanish, for example, enslaved the Indians in regions under their control. The English struck upon the idea of indentured servitude to solve the labor problem in Virginia. Virtually all the European powers eventually turned to African slavery to provide labor on their islands in the West Indies. Slavery was eventually transferred to other colonies in both South and North America.

Because of the interactions of these very diverse peoples, the process of European colonization of the western hemisphere was a complex one, indeed. Individual members of each group confronted situations that were most often not of their own making or choosing. These individuals responded with the means available to them. For most, these means were not sufficient to prevail. Yet these people were not simply victims; they were active agents trying to shape their own destinies. That many of them failed should not detract from their efforts.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which object is at the center of the solar system in the geometric model ​
Sloan [31]

Answer:

The Earth per medieval beleifs

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
6. What were the NAACP's objectives? How did they attempt to achieve them? Type your response here
uranmaximum [27]

\huge \sf {\orange {\underline {\pink{\underline {❥︎A᭄ɴsᴡᴇʀ࿐ :−}}}}}

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), interracial American organization created to work for the abolition of segregation and discrimination in housing, education, employment, voting, and transportation; to oppose racism; and to ensure African Americans their constitutional rights.

THANKS!

mark as brainlist

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is an example of civil disobedience
motikmotik

Answer:

Boston Tea Party.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
To what extent should Columbus day be celebrated?<br> I need argument essay about this topic!
Anarel [89]

Assuming you're pro-Columbus day, these are points that can be made:

Being historically accurate, Columbus day should be celebrated because he attempted and was successful at colonizing and helping America grow.

A common argument trying to counter being pro-Columbus day is the mention of killing Native Americans, so you can mention that diseases had already existed and were the primary cause of death in the New Land rather than Natives being killed (keep in mind though that disease and murder were both factors).

Another Pro argument that could be made is the fact that yes, vikings DID find America first, however Columbus helped Americas economy, etc.


Assuming you're anti-Columbus day, these are more points:

What Christopher Columbus did to Native Americans is unjust, essentially he took land from the Natives and they were forced to convert and change their lifestyle in order to work with Columbus or were killed; brutality is unacceptable.

The day itself should be focused on the Native American victims of Columbus.

The vikings technically found the New Land.


I hope this helped a little! :)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Was martin luther a revolutionary or a reactionary
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Romans' tolerance of religion add to the stability and growth of the empire?
    9·1 answer
  • What is something good that came out of the Vietnam war.<br> 1 good sentence plz
    8·1 answer
  • Don't feel well please help
    7·2 answers
  • What examples of injustice did Martin Luther King Jr. mention in his speech?
    6·2 answers
  • The 1968 Tet offensive Group of answer choices All the given answers are correct. was a substantial military victory for the Uni
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes the African Diaspora that resulted from the slave trade?
    7·2 answers
  • What was a long-term effect of the bubonic plague on Europe?
    14·2 answers
  • From the lesson, a group of people with common practices, activities, and interests is
    5·1 answer
  • What similar causes do most wars have in common?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!