Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Hello there.
<span>Repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820
· was created as a means of constructing a transcontinental railroad
· created two new states in the middle of the United States
· let the states decide whether or not to allow slavery
Which law is being described here?
</span><span>C) Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 </span>
Answer: Post-war economic growth of the north and west
Explanation:
The desert fathers did not flee from fellowship
