1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olenka [21]
3 years ago
15

True or false: Work zone speed limits are enforced even when no work is underway. 20

Law
2 answers:
Savatey [412]3 years ago
6 0
This is True because they would take the signs down if they did not want the speed limit to be enforced.
Leona [35]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Work zone speed limits are usually lower than the initial speed limit. This speed limit is the highest you may drive within the area. While workers are not present, law enforcement are. Fines still apply and may be doubled.

You might be interested in
What is the scale factor the smaller rectangle to the larger rectangle?
Mamont248 [21]

Answer: [18] units

Explanation: I help ;)

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many injuries are there in the state of Oregon each year due to DUIs
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

An estimated total of 6,000 crashes in Oregon involved alcohol which killed 188 and injured an estimated 1,900 people.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
A flashing yellow or amber traffic light means:<br> -Proceed with caution.
klemol [59]
Yellow light flashing
6 0
2 years ago
DUE TODAY!!! PLEASE HELP!!!
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor encouraged her staff to enjoy whitewater rafting, Mexican take-out brunch and tours of the Smithsonian. Justice Stephen Breyer loves to read French manuscripts and cultivated his distaste for footnotes during his clerkship to Arthur Goldberg. Such details were plentiful as Professor John Feerick introduced Justice O'Connor and her former colleague Justice Breyer to a well-heeled audience of lawyers and law students at Fordham Law School yesterday morning.

The two justices, and co-hosts of the day's symposium, sat together at a small table for their introductory panel, "Judicial Independence and Impartiality." Sandra Day O'Connor, dressed in a violet suit with gold buttons, her blonde hair now a shock of snowy white, frowned as she tried to twist the top off her water bottle, then leaned over towards Breyer and held it out to him. He wordlessly took it, unscrewed the top, and handed it back.

Sally Rider, Director of the William Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona, kicked things off with a series of questions. Why, she asked O'Connor, did she decide to convene this conference on judicial independence in the first place?

O'Connor said she remembered seeing  "Impeach Earl Warren" signs in New Mexico and Arizona when she was growing up, and said that in her final years on the Supreme Court, attacks on judges increased, including proposals for mass impeachments of judges involved in the Terri Schiavo case, or proposals to cut judicial terms short, or a particularly disconcerting movement towards "Jail4Judges," a campaign to allow citizen panels to review rulings from the bench, with the ability to even imprison—as the name tantalizingly implies—those who made bad decisions. These developments were "very depressing," she said, and so she decided to use her retirement to call attention to these attacks on judges.

"An independent judiciary is an essential bedrock principle, and we're losing it."  The reason was in part the fact that civics and government are not a requirement for high school graduation. "One third of Americans can't name the three branches of government, but two thirds can name a judge on American Idol!"

Money has been pouring in to state judicial elections in recent years, including races for State Supreme Court justices. A 2004 campaign for a seat on the Illinois Supreme Court brought in a record-setting $9.3 million in political contributions, including hundreds of thousands of dollars from State Farm, a company with a case pending before the court. And just recently,  Wisconsin voters were subjected to over 11,000 televised campaign ads in the weeks before their state's Supreme Court race, over ninety percent of which were purchased by special interest groups (racking up a bill of well over 3.6 million dollars). Said O'Connor, "We put cash in the courtrooms, and it's just wrong." She then pointed to the room of lawyers and students. "You should take this seriously." (A later panel backed up O'Connor's concerns. New York Times legal correspondent Adam Liptak, Brennan Center attorney James Sample and Professor Michael Dimino discussed evidence that judges tend to rule in favor of their campaign contributors.)

She went on. "No other nation in the world elects judges." She pointed to Georgina Woods, the chief justice of Ghana, sitting in the front row, as if to illustrate her point.

"Why are we tolerating this? What are we going to do about it?" Then, seeming to remember that the initial question posed to her several minutes before was "why did you convene this conference," she added, "That's why," and sat back in her chair. The audience laughed and applauded.

Breyer took the floor next. Keeping state courts impartial is a major issue, but try talking about it with people "and they're asleep after five minutes." He recounted a trip to Russia he had made when serving as an appellate judge for the First Circuit after he was appointed by Carter. Meeting with Russian judges from across the country, he was surprised to hear their accounts of "telephone justice," when the party boss calls and tells judges which way to vote. "They asked me, ‘do you have telephone justice in the United States,' and I had to explain to them that no, the President wouldn't call you. He'd be crazy to do that."

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why do candidates interested in pretrial services need to have an interest in different locations?
V125BC [204]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Anna works at a local bank and helps first-time buyers apply for mortgages. She walks them through the application process and w
    14·1 answer
  • What is the difference between original and appellate jurisdiction
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between a lawyer and an attorney?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT true about public trust?
    5·1 answer
  • What your favorite food says about you
    15·1 answer
  • How blood spatter could be used in crime scene reconstruction?
    13·1 answer
  • Should community service always fit the crime, or should these sentences be based on the needs of the community? Explain.
    9·2 answers
  • What in jrotc does Integrity mean?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the exception to the 4th Amendment
    15·1 answer
  • 8. What qualifies as a projected bloodstain?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!