Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it is a felony for an auditor to willfully fail to maintain proper records of audits and work papers for at least five years.
Option d
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 is a federal act providing rigorous auditing of government corporations ' banking regulations. Legislators also produced legislation to ensure safety for investors, employees and the community from accounting irregularities and dishonest financial practices.
Sarbanes-Oxley offers for a new act entitled "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act 2002" (CCFA Act), which promises to change federal criminal law to the following:
-
Prohibit anyone from intentionally changing, damage, mutilation, and covering, cover-up, falsifying or accessing any documents in a matter that is within the competence of any government agency or any federal bankrupt case, obstructing or affecting an inquiry.
- Forbid an auditor from intentionally or inadvertently not holding any inspection or examination papers relating to a government undertaking over a five-year period although it's not a felony for Sarbanes-Oxley to hold these working papers for at least 5 years, over seven years, the auditors must retain their records.
Answer:
Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer drug. The defense requested a copy of the trade secret documents. The government contended that the defense did not need access to the documents except under supervision of the judge. The defense maintained a right of full access to the documents so the defense of impossibil- ity could be established, meaning Hsu could not steal trade secrets that did not exist. District court agreed with the defense; government appealed. Must the defendant be allowed full access to trade secrets that are a key part of a case? [U.S. v. Hsu, 155 F. 3d 189, 3rd Cir. (1998)]
Explanation:
Answer:
no it can't be
Explanation:
because in your state they're illegal and by you trying to take them home from a state that they are legal in makes it illegal
Previous experiences and culture are two factors that effect how an individual interprets something.
