Advantages that the English had over the French in the Battle of Agincourt are a muddy field to slow the French down, the lethal longbow, and two wood lines that protected the English.
Battle of Agincourt was a decisive war in the Hundred Years' battle that resulted in the victory of the English over the French. The English army, led by way of King Henry V, famously achieved victory despite the numerical superiority of its opponent.
The Battle of Agincourt on 25 October 1415 noticed Henry V of Britain defeat an overwhelmingly larger French navy at some stage in the Hundred-year war. The English won the way to the advanced longbow, subject position.
On top of the crowded formations, heavy armor, and lack of field, troops needed to face another obstacle; a slim battlefield. The French navy all through that time frame become no longer cut out for constricted battlefield combat; the discipline and preparedness of the English soldiers overpowered the French with extremely good ease.
Learn more about Battle of Agincourt here brainly.com/question/15166220
#SPJ4
Answer:
A.to define the state's boundaries
Explanation:
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
The answer is c. amendments to the Constitution that would strengthen New England's political power
Answer:
They were sent to Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. thats the loction Oklahoma
Explanation:
