Answer:
The cash received by ABC company from the issuing of stock is $15,000.
Explanation:
It is given that ABC company issued 3000 shares of stock for $5 per share.
The cash received by ABC company from the issuing 3000 shares of stock is
It is also given that ABC company issued 5000 shares for land valued at $10,000. It means ABC company received land instead of cash. So, total cash received by ABC company from the issuing of stock is $15000
Therefore, the cash received by ABC company from the issuing of stock is $15,000.
The closest answer that i can think of is categorized by consumer. By consumer, we are saying that you have to categorize them based on what they like meaning based on what they like at their age. For example, if you are going to market a pizza store to them, one of the best ways to do that is to position your pizza store as a place for friends to hang out because teenagers, at that age, love to hang out with friends and to be cool. So you have to categorize a teenage market by their interests when they are at that certain adolescent age
Answer:
HPR = holding period Return is 20%
Explanation:
- Given original Investment = $100
- Short sale proceeds for 1 share = $100
- Investment made of $100 + short sale proceeds of $100 at 5% YTM.
- So Maturity Value = Investment x (1+YTM)^number of years
- = 200 x (1 + 0.05)^1 = 210
- Therefore, In order to cover Short sale of 1 share, we will have to buy 1 share at a closing value of $90
- As such, holding period Return = (Investment proceeds from ZCB - Buying price of stock - Investment amount) / Investment Amount
- = (210 - 90 - 100) / 100 = 0.2 or 20%
- Hence, HPR = holding period Return is 20%
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
a)use an ice paddle. it is the most suitable way
