July 28th 1915 <span>to restore order and maintain political and economic stability in the Caribbean.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
While the President customarily delegates supreme command of the forces in active service, there is no constitutional reason why he should do so, and he has been known to resolve personally important questions of military policy. Lincoln early in 1862 issued orders for a general advance in the hopes of stimulating McClellan to action; Wilson in 1918 settled the question of an independent American command on the Western Front; Truman in 1945 ordered that the bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.206 As against an enemy in the field, the President possesses all the powers which are accorded by international law to any supreme commander. “He may invade the hostile country, and subject it to the sovereignty and authority of the United States.”207 In the absence of attempts by Congress to limit his power, he may establish and prescribe the jurisdiction and procedure of military commissions, and of tribunals in the nature of such commissions, in territory occupied by Armed Forces of the United States, and his authority to do this sometimes survives cessation of hostilities.208 He may employ secret agents to enter the enemy’s lines and obtain information as to its strength, resources, and movements.209 He may, at least with the assent of Congress, authorize commercial intercourse with the enemy.210 He may also requisition property and compel services from American citizens and friendly aliens who are situated within the theater of military operations when necessity requires, thereby incurring for the United States the obligation to render “just compensation.”211 By the same warrant, he may bring hostilities to a conclusion by arranging an armistice, stipulating conditions that may determine to a great extent the ensuing peace.212 He may not, however, effect a permanent acquisition of territory,213 though he may govern recently acquired territory until Congress sets up a more permanent regime.214
Answer:
The arrangement of the events will be:
- Pinckney's Treaty
(27th October 1795)
-
Spain's transfer of territory to France (1st October 1800)
-
Louisiana Purchase (4th July 1803)
-
Pike's expedition in the Southwest (15th July 1806)
The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
In the above questions, the events are missing. Please find the attachment of the full question.
- Spain as well as the US signed the Pinckney Treaty agreement to establish the boundaries throughout northern Europe between some of the US and the Spanish nations, as well as to control ruling on either the Mississippi River.
- With either the Treaty of San Ildefonso during 1800, Spain gave colonial territory across Louisiana towards France.
- The Louisiana Purchase seems to have been a contractual relationship one where France transferred to either the US in 1803 2 144 476 km² of colonial lands throughout America for something like a selling costs of $15 million.
- Pike's exploration seems to have been a future operation undertaken throughout 1806 until 1807, on support including its US government, to investigate the Louisiana purchase which the US had bought from either the French throughout 1803.
I think it’s the answer is A because Colonial assemblies denounced the law claiming the tax was illegal on the grounds that they had no representation in Parliament.
Answer:
Religious freedom and an escape from Great Britain
