Answer:
Generally, in every democratic state, governments promote their public policies based on the needs of their inhabitants. Therefore, public opinion and the facts that affect the population turn out to be decisive factors when the government determines which issues deserve to be addressed and resolved.
Thus, for example, demonstrations, protests or social problems are those that highlight the government regarding an unfavorable situation, so that it passes through Congress the necessary laws destined to improve said situation.
In short, the government is nothing other than the representation of the will of the people. Therefore, its main objective is to solve people's problems and guarantee a better quality of life, with which the daily events that affect them have an enormous weight in determining the public policies to be carried out.
Answer:
Even very familiar types of matter (electrons, positrons, protons, neutrons, helium nuclei) pass through familiar matter to some degree, which is why transmission electron microscopes, neutron scattering experiments, proton radiation therapy, etc. work. ( parpaphraze it)
Explanation:
The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar.
<h3>Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States? </h3>
The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs.
It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents.
Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
<u>Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement explained below: </u>
- The Fourth Amendment permits the right to be free from non-reasonable searches by the government.
- The government should complete an analysis of the commitment of crime that had taken place before the search warrant to be given.
- They also have permission to search the area whether the area has done any illegal things.
- The government is much more careful in protecting the law right to liberty and they are so consciousness in not disturbing the normal people.
