Absolutely not!
you should look at a few articles, and see.
Answer:
k = rate constant
A & B = reactants
x & y = reactant orders
Given reaction: aA + bB + C → dD + eE
Rate Law: Rate = k[A]q[B]r[C]s
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representatives tacitly acknowledged slavery and kept the Southern slave states from rejecting the Constitution. It was called the Three-Fifths Compromise.
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from the southern states and delegates from the northern states during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate centered on on the fact whether slaves would be counted at the same time as determining the total population of a state to determine legislative representation and for taxative functions. The matter was important, while that population number then used to determine how many seats the state would have in the House of Representatives for the next ten years. The effect was to give the southern states one-third more seats in Congress and one-third more votes they would otherwise have, allowing slave interests to largely dominate the United States government until 1865.
Answer:
If the judge need info he has to convince the lawers so no and yes
Explanation:
Answer:
well
Explanation:
If they are not careful the results can be wrong and they might mess up the evidence. The evidence is so critical to what ever they have to solve. Again tho, The results can also be wrong, and they could mess up something really bad.
